Abstract:The inappropriate fundraising by some charities has undoubtedly shaken public confidence (Dillion, and Fanning, 2011). Research on youth charity accountability is one of the most pervasive and critical themes inside third sector research. This study will contribute additional knowledge to the third sector using the Social Exchange Theory (SET) and Weber’s theory of formal and substantive rationality. This theory would be best suited in clarifying resident attitudes toward accountability in the charity sector, due to its economic factor and non-economic (social) factor influencing rationality. The aim is to access the process of social exchange regarding building youth charity accountability. This study sought to expand the literature on resident attitudes toward youth charity accountability by addressing four specific gaps. An additional theory which bolsters and reinforce SET as a clarification of why youth charity accountability may support or resist sustainable charity development (Markovsky, and Cook, 1989). The lack of empirical measures of youth charity accountability within the context of sustainable charity. Several studies led in this area have approached the concept theoretically (Deans, and Ware, 1986). Utilising Churchill's (1979) proposals for scale advancement, this study will be based on the firm theoretical establishment by creating and approving an empirical measure of accountability on partnership, innovation and policy. The incorporation of multidimensional and multi-item measures of accountability that existed to support youth charity. Research has yet to be used as an antecedent within a resident attitude model (McDonnell, 2017; Servalli, 2013; Fowles, 1993) that developed and validated a multidimensional and multi-item scale to address this gap. There is limited research on accountability in charity (Yang, Northcott, and Sinclair, 2018). This has been recognised by several scholars (Dunn, 2012; Paul, 1991; Valentinov, 2011; Dhanani, and Connolly, 2012) calling for in-depth research across the third sector rather than solely looking at the private sector. The researcher will use a mixed-method approach in stages. Stage 1: Archival research and six case study in the form of exploratory interviews, then three validating interview sharing findings. Stage 2: six Pilot tests to asked how they would interpret the questions and six pre-tests of the survey to test the result from the pilot test in England and Scotland. Stage 3: 500 Quantitative survey using five Likert scales. Using conceptual constructs of policy accountability, innovation accountability, partnership accountability; and developing them into a reliable and valid measurement scales. These scales will be tried in a Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Model analysis to test all dimensions to see the relationships with charity accountability positive and negative impacts. Social exchange theory (SET) is one of the most influential conceptual paradigms in organisational behaviour. Despite its usefulness, theoretical ambiguities within SET remain. This study will be clarifying about why charity accountability may support or resist sustainable development. It will help to improve performance, accountability and enhance youth Charity by creating and approving an empirical measure of accountability on policy, partnership and innovation. It will also create an understanding of non-economic (social) factor influencing benefit and cost relationship.

NGO accounting and accountability: past, present and future

NGOs, public accountability, and critical accounting education: Making data speak

The Rise of Social and Non-Profit Organizations and their Relevance for Social Accounting Studies

Evaluating NGO accounting and reporting practices in a developing economy: the case for reforms

The multiplicity of logics, trust, and interdependence in donor‐imposed reporting practices in the nonprofit sector

Research horizons for public and private not‐for‐profit sector reporting: moving the bar in the right direction

Accounting for stakeholder engagement in developing countries: proposing an engagement system to respond to sustainability demands

Accountability and Governance Reporting by Non-Profit Organizations

A concept in flux: questioning accountability in the context of global health cooperation

Accountability Online: Understanding the Web-Based Accountability Practices of Nonprofit Organizations

Follower or Challenger? How Chinese Non-governmental Organizations Manage Accountability Requirements from Funders

Nonprofit Accountability:A Public Choice Perspective

Resident Attitudes toward Youth Charity Accountability: Developing and Testing Accountability through Youth Charity

COVID-19 and accounting as multidimensional technical, social and moral practice: a framework for future research

Financial Accounting Research, Practice, and Financial Accountability

Accounting for Society: Examining the Interplay between Financial Reporting and Social Responsibility

The nexus between non‐governmental organisations involved in conservation and profit‐seeking state‐owned enterprises: A potential alternative credibility enhancing mechanism for biodiversity disclosures?

NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS IN THE FACE OF A DILEMMA: ACCOUNTING BOOKS VERSUS SIMPLIFIED RECORD OF REVENUES AND COSTS

Government accounting reforms in Sub-Saharan African countries and the selective ignorance of the epistemic community: A competing logics perspective

Public sector accounting in emerging economies: a review of the papers published in the first decade of Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies