Concurrence of Porin Loss and Modular Amplification of β-Lactamase Encoding Genes Drives Carbapenem Resistance in a Cohort of Recurrent Enterobacterales Bacteremia

William C. Shropshire,Samuel L. Aitken,Reed Pifer,Jiwoong Kim,Micah M. Bhatti,Xiqi Li,Awdhesh Kalia,Jessica Galloway-Peña,Pranoti Sahasrabhojane,Cesar A. Arias,David E. Greenberg,Blake M. Hanson,Samuel A. Shelburne
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/616961
2019-04-23
Abstract:ABSTRACT Background Carbapenem resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) remain urgent antimicrobial resistance threats. Approximately half of CRE clinical isolates lack carbapenem hydrolyzing enzymes and develop carbapenem resistance through alternative mechanisms. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the development of carbapenem resistance mechanisms from clonal, recurrent extended-spectrum β-lactamase positive Enterobacterales (ESBL-E) bacteremia isolates in a vulnerable patient population. Methods This study investigated a historical, retrospective cohort of ESBL-E bacteremia cases in the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) from January 2015 to July 2016. Phylogenetic and comparative genomic analyses were performed to identify clonal, recurrent ESBL-E isolates developing carbapenem resistance. Oxford Nanopore Technology (ONT) long-read and Illumina short-read sequencing data were used to generate consensus assemblies and to identify signatures of mobile genetic element mediated amplification and transposition of antimicrobial resistance genes. Serial passaging experiments were performed on a set of clinical ST131 ESBL-E isolates to recapitulate in vivo observations. qPCR and qRT-PCR were used to determine respective copy number and transcript levels of β-lactamase genes. Results 116 ESBL-E bacteremia cases were identified, 16 of which had documented recurrent infections. Four serial, recurrent isolates displayed a carbapenem resistant phenotype, three without the acquisition of a known carbapenemase. These three isolates had non-carbapenemase-producing CRE (non-CP-CRE) mechanisms driven by IS 26 - and IS Ecp1 -mediated amplification of respective translocatable units (TU) and transposition units (TPU) harboring both bla OXA-1 and bla CTX-M variants with concomitant outer membrane porin disruption. The TU and TPU structures inserted into the open reading frames of outer membrane porin genes in a subset of non-CP-CRE isolates. Serial passage of an index ST131 ESBL-E isolate under selective carbapenem exposure resulted in chromosomal amplification of modular, TUs harboring β-lactamase genes with concomitant porin inactivation, recapitulating the in vivo carbapenem resistance progression. Long-read sequencing of two additional MDACC bacteremia strains identified similar non-CP-CRE mechanisms observed in the serial isolates. Conclusions Non-CP-CRE de novo mechanisms were the primary driver of CRE development in recurrent bacteremia cases within this vulnerable patient population. The incorporation of long-read ONT data into AMR surveillance platforms is critical to identify high-risk CRE isolates that are difficult to identify with low-resolution phenotypic and molecular characterization methods.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?