Abstract:The development of quantitative analysis in social science calls for the establishment of an open and transparent mechanism to allow research data and models to be shared to the community,and the research findings to be verify and elaborated by others.The core in this practice is replication studies in social sciences.In this essay,we review the discussion and practices of replication studies in western social sciences and highlight its significance in promoting quantitative social science research in China.Why is the replication study necessary?First,the collectivity of social science research suggests the research process should be transparent;Second,the principle of parsimony inquantitative social analysis requires the verification of research process;Third, the issue of endogeneity calls for extension of the past quantitative social analysis;Four,as a matter of fact,the rate of successful verification in published social science literature is low.Fifth,replication study is important to the teaching and training of quantitative social science;and finally, replication study can facilitate the professionalization of quantitative sociology and make us of late-development advantages.Why is replication study feasible? First,the nature of quantitative data suggests that the results be verifiable; second,the development of techniques in quantitative social research makes it possible to extend the replications;third,internet provides an easy platform for sharing data and working programs;third,the practice of replication studies in other disciplines such as economics in other countries has provided valuable experience;and finally,replicable studies can increase the academic reputation of the author and the journal.Notwithstanding what are said above, there are many concerns that need to be addressed in promoting replication study.The first is the ownership of the data analyzed.The author may not have rights to share the data with other colleagues.The second issue is that it may bring extra burden to the authors,reviewers,and replicators.There might also be issues related to the sharing of the programs,the choice between the sharing of original data and working data,and results from replication studies may lead to pressures on the authors and personal attacks.We use two empirical examples as the template how to conduct the replication and the extension.The first example by Chen,Volker and Flap (2011),using more sophisticated modeling to replicate a study by two Dutch sociologists on how the use of social capital affects the attainment of the first job in East Germany.The second example is a rejoinder to the replication results on how selectivity of entry into the private sector affects earnings inequality in urban China.Both examples show how the replication and extensions help to advance the knowledge in the field.The paper concludes with the consensus and practical protocol that should be established in the academia of sociology.

Play It Again, Sam! An Analysis of Constructive Replication in the Organizational Sciences

Replication and Reproducibility in Cross-Cultural Psychology

Replication in Second Language Research: Narrative and Systematic Reviews and Recommendations for the Field

Replication studies in international business

Replication studies in top management journals: An empirical investigation of prevalence, types, outcomes, and impact

Towards an Open-Source Social Science:The Replication Study in Quantitative Social Analysis

Large Scale Replication Projects in Contemporary Psychological Research

Conceptualizing and Evaluating Replication Across Domains of Behavioral Research

Replication is important for educational psychology: Recent developments and key issues

Epistemic Functions of Replicability in Experimental Sciences: Defending the Orthodox View

You Can't Publish Replication Studies (and How to Anyways)

Replications are informative, particularly when they fail

The Replication of Equivalence Studies

Replication studies in the Netherlands: Lessons learned and recommendations for funders, publishers and editors, and universities

Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015

Replication marketplaces would help science to become more self-correcting

Replication of Audit and Financial Accounting Research: We Do More than We Think

Are replications mainstream now? A comparison of support for replications expressed in the policies of social psychology journals in 2015 and 2022

A discipline-wide investigation of the replicability of Psychology papers over the past two decades

Replication Studies Using Secondary or Nonexperimental Datasets

Replication, falsification, and the crisis of confidence in social psychology