Abstract:Background: The evaluation of the protective effect of X-ray protective clothing requires new criteria. The current concept assumes more or less uniform covering of the torso with protective material. The frequently worn heavy wrap-around aprons can weigh 7 to 8 kg. As relevant studies show, orthopedic damage can result from long-term activity. It should therefore be investigated whether the apron weight can be reduced by optimizing the material distribution. For a radiobiological evaluation of the protective effect, the "effective dose" should be used. Methods: Numerous laboratory measurements were performed with an Alderson Rando phantom as well as dose measurements on clinical personnel. The measurements were supplemented by Monte Carlo simulation of an interventional workplace in which a female ICRP reference phantom was used for the operator. The measured back doses on the Alderson phantom as well as the measured back doses at interventional workplaces were based on the personal equivalent dose Hp(10). Monte Carlo simulations were used to introduce protection factors for the protective clothing based on the "effective dose" introduced in radiation protection. Results: Back doses in clinical radiology personnel are largely negligible. Therefore, back protection can be much lower than currently used or can even be eliminated. The Monte Carlo simulations show that the protective effect of protective aprons worn on the body is higher than when the flat protective material is radiated through (3 D effect). About 80 % of the effective dose is attributed to the body region from the gonads to the chest. By additional shielding of this area, the effective dose can be lowered or, optionally, aprons with less weight can be produced. Attention must also be paid to the "radiation leaks" (upper arms, neck, skull), which can reduce the whole-body protective effect. Conclusion: In the future, the evaluation of the protective effect of X-ray protective clothing should be based on the effective dose. For this purpose, effective dose-based protection factors could be introduced, while the lead equivalent should be used for measurement purposes only. If the results are implemented, protective aprons with approx. 40 % less weight can be produced with a comparable protective effect. Key points: · The protective effect of X-ray protective clothing should be described by protection factors based on effective dose.. · The lead equivalent should only be used for measurement purposes.. · More than 80 % of the effective dose is attributed to the body region from the gonads to the chest.. · A reinforcing layer in this area increases the protective effect considerably.. · With optimized material distribution, protective aprons could be up to 40 % lighter.. Citation format: · Eder H. X-Ray Protective Aprons Re-Evaluated. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2023; 195: 234 - 243.

Lightweight Lead Aprons: The Emperor's New Clothes in the Angiography Suite?

Not all lightweight lead aprons and thyroid shields are alike

Light-weight lead aprons--light on weight, protection or labelling accuracy?

Comparison of the radiation protection effect of different radiation protection aprons made of different materials

Evaluation of the scattered radiations of lead and lead-free aprons in diagnostic radiology by MCNPX

Assessment of the Attenuation Properties of Commercial Lead-Free Radiation-Shielding Composite Materials Against Medical X-rays

Radiation Protection Clothing in X-Ray Diagnostics – Influence of the Different Methods of Measurement on the Lead Equivalent and the Required Mass

Answers to if the Lead Aprons Are Really Helpful in Nuclear Medicine from the Perspective of Spectroscopy

Radiation attenuation by lead and nonlead materials used in radiation shielding garments

Effectiveness of a new radiation protection system in the interventional radiology setting

Material characterization and Monte Carlo simulation of lead and non-lead X-Ray shielding materials

Lead equivalence testing using a custom-built testing kit

Lead-Dust Contamination on Radiation Protection Apparel

A Review of Radiation Protection Apron For Health Facilities: With Focus On Lead Apron

A comparison of dose savings of lead and lightweight aprons for shielding of 99m-Technetium radiation

Design and Development of a Low-Cost, Less Weight, and Lead-Free Composite Materials for Radiation Shielding

Investigation of the Efficiency and Quality of Lightweight Gowns with Multi-Layered Nanoparticles Compositions of Bismuth, Tungsten, Barium, and Copper

Simulation of the Shielding Effect of Lead Apron Undergoing Chest CT Scan.

Quality of radiation protection aprons and quality control routines at different diagnostic imaging modalities

X-Ray Protective Aprons Re-Evaluated

A proposal for the performance evaluation of 0.5 mm lead aprons used in nuclear medicine