No Empathy for Empathy: An Existential Reading of Husserl’s Forgotten Question

Iraklis Ioannidis
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2019.1602320
2019-03-15
International Journal of Philosophical Studies
Abstract:Empathy is a term used to denote our experience of connecting or feeling with an Other. The term has been used both by psychologists and phenomenologists as a supplement for our biological capacity to understand an Other. In this paper I would like to challenge the possibility of such empathy. If empathy is employed to mean that <i>we know</i> another person's feelings, then I argue that this is impossible. I argue that there is an equivocation in the use of the term 'empathy' which conditions the appropriation of the Other <i>as we think that we know</i> how the Other feels. To claim that we do know an Other's feelings – or any kind of their intentional experience – means to appropriate their experience through our own. I will first reveal the equivocal use of the term 'empathy' and, then, I will explore Husserl's use of the term. In Husserl, the understanding of an Other as empathy is only partial. I shall conclude by reiterating a thesis from philosophy of existence and feminist theory according to which to know another person comes from creating a community with them and not because we have a biological structure that can mirror each other's feelings.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?