Ferric citrate, nitrate, saponin and their combinations affect in vitro ruminal fermentation, production of sulphide and methane and abundance of select microbial populations

H. Wu,Q. Meng,Z. Zhou,Z. Yu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.14286
2019-05-21
Journal of Applied Microbiology
Abstract:<h3> Aims</h3><p>This study investigated the effects of ferric citrate, nitrate, and saponin, both individually and in combination, on sulfidogenesis, methanogenesis, rumen fermentation, and abundances of select microbial populations using <i>in vitro</i> rumen cultures. </p><h3> Methods and Results</h3><p>Ferric citrate (50 mg L<sup>−1</sup>), Quillaja saponin (0·6 g L<sup>−1</sup>), and sodium nitrate (5 mmol L<sup>−1</sup>) were used in <i>in vitro</i> ruminal fermentation. Ferric citrate alone, its combination with saponin and/or nitrate lowered the aqueous sulfide concentration and total sulfide production. Methane production was suppressed by nitrate alone (by up to 32·92%), its combination with saponin (25·04%) and with both saponins with nitrate (25·92%). None of the treatments adversely affected feed digestion or rumen fermentation. The population of sulfate‐reducing bacteria was increased by nitrate and saponin individually, while that of total archaea was decreased by nitrate alone and the combination of the three inhibitors. </p><h3> Conclusions</h3><p>Nitrate and its combination with saponin or both ferric citrate and saponin substantially decreased methane production. Most importantly, the decreased methane production was not at the expense of feed digestion or fermentation. Sulfidogenesis from the sulfate present in the high‐sulfur diets can be suppressed competitively by ferric citrate, though it was elevated by saponin and nitrate.</p><h3> Significance and Impact of Study</h3><p>The results of this study demonstrated that combinations of certain methane inhibitors, which have different mechanisms of anti‐methanogenic actions or inhibit different guilds of microbes involved in methane production and sulfate reduction, can be more effective and practical than individual inhibitors, not only in mitigating enteric methane emission but also in lowering the risk of sulfur‐associated polioencephalomalacia in feedlot cattle fed high sulfur diets.</p><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.</p>
microbiology,biotechnology & applied microbiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?