Mechanisms of action of metformin with special reference to cardiovascular protection

Alexey V. Zilov,Sulaf Ibrahim Abdelaziz,Afaf AlShammary,Ali Al Zahrani,Ashraf Amir,Samir Helmy Assaad Khalil,Kerstin Brand,Nabil Elkafrawy,Ahmed A.K. Hassoun,Adel Jahed,Nadim Jarrah,Sanaa Mrabeti,Imran Paruk
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.3173
2019-07-24
Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews
Abstract:Management guidelines continue to identify metformin as initial pharmacologic antidiabetic therapy of choice for people with type 2 diabetes without contraindications, despite recent randomised trials that have demonstrated significant improvements in cardiovascular outcomes with newer classes of antidiabetic therapies. The purpose of this review is to summarise the current state of knowledge of metformin's therapeutic actions on blood glucose and cardiovascular clinical evidence, and to consider the mechanisms which underlie them. The effects of metformin on glycaemia occur mainly in the liver, but metformin‐stimulated glucose disposal by the gut has emerged as an increasingly import site of action of metformin. Additionally, metformin induces increased secretion of GLP‐1 from intestinal L‐cells. Clinical cardiovascular protection with metformin is supported by three randomised outcomes trials (in newly‐diagnosed and late stage, insulin‐treated type 2 diabetes patients) and a wealth of observational data. Initial evidence suggests that co‐treatment with metformin may enhance the impact of newer, incretin‐based therapies on cardiovascular outcomes, an important observation as metformin can be combined with any other antidiabetic agent. Multiple potential mechanisms support the concept of cardiovascular protection with metformin beyond those provided by reduced blood glucose, including weight loss, improvements in haemostatic function, reduced inflammation and oxidative stress, and inhibition of key steps in the process of atherosclerosis. Accordingly, metformin remains well placed to support improvements in cardiovascular outcomes, from diagnosis and throughout the course of type 2 diabetes, even in this new age of improved outcomes in type 2 diabetes.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?