Abstract:Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Ahead of Print. Hate crimes send messages of intolerance that can cause significant emotional and behavioral harm to entire identity groups. Previous research, based on intergroup emotions theory, has helped explain the psychological mechanisms that underpin the indirect effects of anti-LGBT+ hate crime, showing that incidents give rise to perceptions of threat among community members, which in turn elicit certain emotional reactions that trigger specific behavioral outcomes. This article provides two significant contributions to this developing knowledgebase. First, it provides an important replication of the theoretical model with another frequently targeted community: Muslim people. In addition, it offers the first quantitative analysis of how combinations of different emotions trigger discrete behavioral responses in the aftermath of hate crime, thereby providing much-needed nuance to the intergroup emotions theory model. Across two studies (Study 1: N = 589 LGBT+ participants; Study 2: N = 347 Muslim participants), we show that, for both LGBT+ and Muslim participants, indirect experiences of hate crimes are associated with greater perceptions of threat, which are then positively associated with anger, anxiety, and shame, that link to behavioral intentions: avoidance, pro-action, security behaviors, and retaliation. Latent class analyses further revealed that participants' emotional reactions tend to cluster into four distinct profiles in both communities: people scored mid-range on all emotions, or high anger with low shame, or high anger with high anxiety, or low shame. These combinations had direct implications for intended behaviors across both groups: experiencing high anger with high anxiety was a cogent motivator of action. Most significantly, we provide new insights into how and why different emotions interact to predict both similar and divergent behaviors in the aftermath of hate crime incidents. Our findings yield important new knowledge that holds the potential of shaping both public policies and practices aimed at addressing the impacts of hate crimes.

Pride and prejudice: Exploring how identity processes shape public attitudes towards Australian counter-terrorism measures

Public perceptions of the threat of terrorist attack in Australia and anticipated compliance behaviours

Producing 'internal suspect bodies': divisive effects of UK counter-terrorism measures on Muslim communities in Leeds and Bradford

Born radicals? Prevent, positivism, and ‘race-thinking’

The enactment of the counter-terrorism “Prevent duty” in British schools and colleges: beyond reluctant accommodation or straightforward policy acceptance

Public Attitudes Towards Government Surveillance of Social Media in Australia

Terrorism and Immigration Policy Preferences

Angry and Afraid: Exploring the Impact of Mixed Emotional Reactions to Hate Crimes With LGBT+ and Muslim Communities

Exploring individual-level predictors of punitive attitudes in Australia

BEYOND BURQAS, BOMBS, AND BOGEYMEN: AUSTRALIAN MUSLIMS AND THE MEDIA

Reducing Islamophobia through Conversation: A Randomized Control Trial

Public fear of protesters and support for protest policing: An experimental test of two theoretical models*

Why me? An autoethnographic account of the bizarre logic of counterterrorism

Policing and social identity: procedural justice, inclusion and cooperation between police and public

Religiosity and the Perception of Interreligious Threats: The Suppressing Effect of Negative Emotions towards God

Crime prevention and reduction programs: How does knowing about community initiatives moderate attitudes towards criminal victimisation?

The Munich Olympics Massacre and the Development of Counter-Terrorism in Australia

The socio-psychological predictors of support for post-truth collective action

The relationship between strong‐ties weak‐ties rationality and COVID‐19 public stigma: A cross‐cultural study of Malaysia and Australia

The hegemony of Prevent: turning counter-terrorism policing into common sense

Public Reactions to Male Versus Female Terrorism: Experimental Evidence for the Male Warrior Hypothesis