Abstract:Background: There is a considerable amount of research showing an association between continuity of care and improved health outcomes. However, the methods used in most studies examine only the pattern of interactions between patients and clinicians through administrative measures of continuity. The patient experience of continuity can also be measured by using patient reported experience measures. Unlike administrative measures, these can allow elements of continuity such as the presence of information or how joined up care is between providers to be measured. Patient experienced continuity is a marker of healthcare quality in its own right. However, it is unclear if, like administrative measures, patient reported continuity is also linked to positive health outcomes. Methods: Cohort and interventional studies that examined the relationship between patient reported continuity of care and a health outcome were eligible for inclusion. Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library were searched in April 2021. Citation searching of published continuity measures was also performed. QUIP and Cochrane risk of bias tools were used to assess study quality. A box-score method was used for study synthesis. Results: Nineteen studies were eligible for inclusion. 15 studies measured continuity using a validated, multifactorial questionnaire or the continuity/co-ordination subscale of another instrument. Two studies placed patients into discrete groups of continuity based on pre-defined questions, one used a bespoke questionnaire, one calculated an administrative measure of continuity using patient reported data. Outcome measures examined were quality of life (n = 11), self-reported health status (n = 8), emergency department use or hospitalisation (n = 7), indicators of function or wellbeing (n = 6), mortality (n = 4) and physiological measures (n = 2). Analysis was limited by the relatively small number of hetrogenous studies. The majority of studies showed a link between at least one measure of continuity and one health outcome. Conclusion: Whilst there is emerging evidence of a link between patient reported continuity and several outcomes, the evidence is not as strong as that for administrative measures of continuity. This may be because administrative measures record something different to patient reported measures, or that studies using patient reported measures are smaller and less able to detect smaller effects. Future research should use larger sample sizes to clarify if a link does exist and what the potential mechanisms underlying such a link could be. When measuring continuity, researchers and health system administrators should carefully consider what type of continuity measure is most appropriate.

A time-duration measure of continuity of care to optimise utilisation of primary health care: a threshold effects approach among people with diabetes

Evaluating continuity of care incorporating a time protective effect of general practitioner care on diabetes related potentially preventable hospitalisations: An application of threshold effects model

Continuity of Care and Healthcare Costs among Patients with Chronic Disease: Evidence from Primary Care Settings in China

The association between continuity of care in the community and health outcomes: a population-based study

Using routinely-collected, linked data to measure and monitor health system performance in Australia: development of an indicator of continuity of primary health care

Optimizing physician‐encounter frequency for type 2 diabetes patients in primary care based on cardiovascular risk assessment: A target trial emulation study

Association between continuity of care in general practice and hospital admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions: cross sectional study of routinely collected, person level data

Does Continuity of Care Have an Effect on Diabetes Quality Measures in a Teaching Practice in an Urban Underserved Community?

How should continuity of care in primary health care be assessed?

Continuity of primary care for type 2 diabetes and hypertension and its association with health outcomes and disease control: insights from Central Vietnam

Continuity of care and clinical outcome: a prospective cohort study

Measuring continuity in primary care: how it is done and why it matters

Impact of continuity of care on mortality and health care costs: a nationwide cohort study in Korea

Health care utilization and costs among coordinated care patients in Southeastern Ontario: A difference-in-differences study of a double propensity score-matched cohort

Does continuity of care with a family physician reduce hospitalizations among older adults?

Exploring the association between primary care efficiency and health system characteristics across European countries: a two-stage data envelopment analysis

Continuity of care and delivery of diabetes and hypertensive care among regular users of primary care services in Chile: a cross-sectional study

Relationship Between Primary Care Visits and Hospital Admissions in Remote Indigenous Patients with Diabetes: A Multivariate Spline Regression Model

Quantifying sustained health system benefits of primary care-based integrated disease management for COPD: a 6-year interrupted time series study

Patient reported measures of continuity of care and health outcomes: a systematic review

Association between continuity of care and subsequent diagnosis of multimorbidity in Ontario, Canada from 2001-2015: A retrospective cohort study