Abstract:This study investigates the sense of agency (SoA) for saccades with implicit and explicit agency measures. In two eye tracking experiments, participants moved their eyes towards on-screen stimuli that subsequently changed color. Participants then either reproduced the temporal interval between saccade and color-change (Experiment 1) or reported the time points of these events with an auditory Libet clock (Experiment 2) to measure temporal binding effects as implicit indices of SoA. Participants were either made to believe to exert control over the color change or not (agency manipulation). Explicit ratings indicated that the manipulation of causal beliefs and hence agency was successful. However, temporal binding was only evident for caused effects, and only when a sufficiently sensitive procedure was used (auditory Libet clock). This suggests a feebler connection between temporal binding and SoA than previously proposed. The results also provide evidence for a relatively fast acquisition of sense of agency for previously never experienced types of action-effect associations. This indicates that the underlying processes of action control may be rooted in more intricate and adaptable cognitive models than previously thought. Oculomotor SoA as addressed in the present study presumably represents an important cognitive foundation of gaze-based social interaction (social sense of agency) or gaze-based human-machine interaction scenarios. Public significance statement In this study, sense of agency for eye movements in the non-social domain is investigated in detail, using both explicit and implicit measures. Therefore, it offers novel and specific insights into comprehending sense of agency concerning effects induced by eye movements, as well as broader insights into agency pertaining to entirely newly acquired types of action-effect associations. Oculomotor sense of agency presumably represents an important cognitive foundation of gaze-based social interaction (social agency) or gaze-based human-machine interaction scenarios. Due to peculiarities of the oculomotor domain such as the varying degree of volitional control, eye movements could provide new information regarding more general theories of sense of agency in future research.

When robots tell you what to do: Sense of agency in human- and robot-guided actions

Intentions with actions: The role of intentionality attribution on the vicarious sense of agency in Human–Robot interaction

Mind in the Machine: Perceived Minds Induce Decision Change

The Body Knows Better: Sensorimotor signals reveal the interplay between implicit and explicit Sense of Agency in the human mind

Constraining the Sense of Agency in Human-Machine Interaction

The Body Knows Better: Sensorimotor signals reveal “Suboptimal” inference of the Sense of Agency in the human mind

The sense of agency in human–AI interactions

When performing actions with robots, attribution of intentionality affects the sense of joint agency

The sense of agency in perception, behaviour and human–machine interactions

An experimental paradigm for studying sense of agency in joint human–machine motor actions

Sense of agency predicts severity of moral judgments

Sense of agency: Sensorimotor signals and social context are differentially weighed at implicit and explicit levels

Folk-Psychological Interpretation of Human vs. Humanoid Robot Behavior: Exploring the Intentional Stance toward Robots

Eye did this! Sense of agency in eye movements

Neural Correlates of the Embodied Sense of Agency

Human Perception of Intrinsically Motivated Autonomy in Human-Robot Interaction

Action Selection and Simultaneously Presented Emotional Sound and Reward: Differential Effects on Implicit and Explicit Sense of Agency

The sense of agency from active causal inference

The Sense of Agency Scale: A Measure of Consciously Perceived Control over One's Mind, Body, and the Immediate Environment

Neural correlates of an illusionary sense of agency caused by virtual reality