The challenge of de‐labeling penicillin allergy

Cosby A. Stone,Jason Trubiano,David T. Coleman,Christine R. F. Rukasin,Elizabeth J. Phillips

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/all.13848

IF: 12.4

2019-05-26

Allergy

Abstract:Even though 8‐25% of most populations studied globally are labeled as penicillin allergic, most diagnoses of penicillin allergy are made in childhood and relate to events that are either not allergic in nature, are low‐risk for immediate hypersensitivity, or are a potential true allergy that has waned over time. Penicillin allergy labels directly impact antimicrobial stewardship by leading to use of less effective and broader spectrum antimicrobials and are associated with antimicrobial resistance. They may also delay appropriate antimicrobial therapy, and lead to increased risk of specific adverse healthcare outcomes. Operationalizing penicillin allergy de‐labeling into a new arm of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) has become an increasing global focus. We performed an evidence‐based narrative review of the literature of penicillin allergy label carriage, the adverse effects of penicillin allergy labels and current approaches and barriers to penicillin allergy de‐labeling. Over the period 1928‐2018 in Pubmed and Medline, search terms used included "penicillin allergy" or "penicillin hypersensitivity" alone or in combination with "adverse events", "testing", "evaluation", "effects", "label", "de‐labeling", "prick or epicutaneous" and "intradermal" skin testing, "oral challenge or provocation" "cross‐reactivity" and "antimicrobial stewardship."

immunology,allergy