2. Cognitive Grammar

Cristiano Broccias
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110540253-002
2019-05-06
Abstract:This chapter discusses how syntax is handled in Langacker’s Cognitive Grammar (CG). It first of all points out that CG rejects the notion of autonomy of language in general and syntax in particular in that various general cognitive abilities and cognitive models are appealed to in order to make sense of linguistic organization and no clear-cut boundaries are assumed to exist between syntax and lexicon. More generally, CG argues that much in language is a matter of degree. The chapter then discusses syntactic functions, which are not regarded as primitives, and constituency. In particular, it highlights that “classical constituency”, traditionally represented by means of syntactic trees in formal approaches, is just one possible level of grammatical organization and description: attention to dynamicity or processing and discourse reveals that grammatical structure may be flat and serial, rather than hierarchical.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?