Abstract:With the concern for the market of food safety, abundant researches on consumer's WTP for organic food have been carried out. This paper aims to validate the conclusion from the research review that the estimates of consumer's WTP for organic food from various researches are statistically significant and attempts to explore the causes, which are accounted for in terms of four factors: sampling err, socio-economic characteristics of sample, research methods and research objects. A wide range of WTPs were reported, among which the maximum value shoots up to 509.2% and the minimum value touches down to 2.3%. The main attributing factors to the variation among estimates are identified as sampling err, socio-economic characteristics of samples and valuation method. It's implied that the sample size of empirical survey should be at least above 200, while open-ended question format, household randomly sampling method and personal interview survey are much more appreciated. In Lusk et al. (2004)'s meta-analysis on consumer's willingness to pay for non-GM foods, the range of estimates is remarkable, from - 67% to 784%. If the significant variance among the estimates of consumer's WTP for non-GM food might be due to uncertainty of potential hazard of food gene modification, the valuation results of consumer's WTP for organic food, popularly accepted as safer, healthier, are expected much more coordinated. Nevertheless, it is found that estimates of consumer's average willingness to pay rage from 3% to 509% among diverse studies. Hence, there is a growing need to evaluate the current research outcomes and to explore what causes the variation in the estimates. There are three primary reasons why understanding the sources of the outcome variation would be useful and important. The most obvious is that if variation comes from various research methods, researchers could estimate the causes of bias, as well as improve the methods in eliciting consumer's willingness to pay to minimize biases caused by sampling and survey methods. In addition, a much more comprehensive understanding of the demand theory concerning food safety would be gained when a more reliable exploration between WTP and socio-economic variables is carried out. Decision-makers could make better use of the valuation outcomes of consumer's willingness to pay as well when they are well acknowledged of potential sources of bias. The purposes of this research are three-folded. Firstly, it provides a comprehensive review of major research findings in the field of consumer's willingness-to-pay for organic food throughout the world and summarizes current explanations for the variation of WTP estimates in the aspects both of individual socio-economic characteristics and research methods. Secondly, with meta-analysis, this paper attempts to validate the conclusion from the research review that the estimates from different researches are statistically significant. Third, this paper attempts to shed light on what causes the difference in the estimates of consumer's WTP for organic food from different researches, in terms of four aspects: sampling err, socio-economic characteristics of sample, research methods and research objects.

Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Organic Foods in China: Bibliometric Review for an Emerging Literature

Interactive Effects of Information and Trust on Consumer Choices of Organic Food: Evidence from China.

Amount of Information and Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Food Traceability in China

The willingness to consume organic food: A review

Consumers’ valuation for cultured meat: a multi-city choice experiment in China

Consumer'S Willingness To Pay A Premium For Organic Fruits In China: A Double-Hurdle Analysis

Consumer’s Willingness to Pay a Premium for Organic Fruits in China: A Double-Hurdle Analysis

Consumer's Willingness to Pay for Organic Food in the Perspective of Meta-Analysis

Influences of background factors on consumers’ purchase intention in China’s organic food market: Assessing moderating role of word-of-mouth (WOM)

Study on the Influencing Factors and Willingness to Pay of Consumers Purchasing Ecological Agricultural Products

Chinese Consumers’ Adoption of a ‘green’ Innovation – the Case of Organic Food

Willingness to Pay for the “green Food” in China

Influencing Factors and Group Differences of Urban Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Low-Carbon Agricultural Products in China

Impact of Consumer Awareness, Knowledge, and Attitudes on Organic Rice Purchasing Behavior in China

Consumer motivation for organic food consumption: Health consciousness or herd mentality

Understanding The Antecedents Of Organic Food Purchases: The Important Roles Of Beliefs, Subjective Norms, And Identity Expressiveness

How stable is the value basis for organic food consumption in China?

Factors Influencing Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Organic Fruits and Vegetables: Empirical Evidence from a Consumer Survey in India

Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Biotech Foods in China

Consumer Preferences and Willingness to Pay for High-Quality Vegetable Oils: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Chinese Residents

The Moderating Role of Human Values in Planned Behavior: the Case of Chinese Consumers' Intention to Buy Organic Food