Fate of cellulose in primary and secondary treatment at municipal water resource recovery facilities

Ahmed Shawki Ahmed,Gholamreza Bahreini,Dang Ho,Ganesh Sridhar,Medhavi Gupta,Coos Wessels,Pim Marcelis,Elsayed Elbeshbishy,Diego Rosso,Domenico Santoro,George Nakhla
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wer.1145
2019-06-04
Water Environment Research
Abstract:Cellulose from toilet paper is a significant fraction of particulate organics, which is recoverable. For the first time, comprehensive mapping and tracking the fate of cellulose across various unit processes at full‐scale in two water resource recovery facilities located in North America and Europe was undertaken. The influent cellulose content accounted for approximately one‐third of the total suspended solids (TSS). Although about 80% of the raw wastewater cellulose was removed in primary treatment, the type of primary treatment process (rotating belt filter (RBF) versus primary clarification (PC)) had a significant impact on cellulose capture and diversion. The high cellulose content of the RBF sludge accounting for 35% of the TSS facilitates cellulose recovery. For the North American plant, with a conventional activated sludge process (SRT of 6‐7 days, preceded by PC), cellulose biodegradation efficiencies of 70%‐90% of the PC effluent were observed in summer and winter. For the European plant, with a modified University of Cape Town process (SRT of 14 days, without primary treatment in train 2, or preceded by RBF in train 1), comparable cellulose biodegradation efficiencies were also observed. Results from laboratory SBRs indicated that cellulose biodegradation efficiency at room temperature was 86% of the influent cellulose.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
environmental sciences,engineering, environmental,water resources,limnology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?