Potential Economic Effects of a Global Trade Conflict

WTO

DOI: https://doi.org/10.30875/7dc4c62e-en

2019-04-01

Abstract:The WTO Global Trade Model is employed to project the medium-run economic effects of a global trade conflict. The trade conflict scenario is based on recent estimates in the literature of the difference between cooperative and non-cooperative tariffs.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The Impact of Geopolitical Conflicts on Trade, Growth, and Innovation

Carlos Góes,Eddy Bekkers

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2203.12173

2022-03-23

General Economics

Abstract:Geopolitical conflicts have increasingly been a driver of trade policy. We study the potential effects of global and persistent geopolitical conflicts on trade, technological innovation, and economic growth. In conventional trade models the welfare costs of such conflicts are modest. We build a multi-sector multi-region general equilibrium model with dynamic sector-specific knowledge diffusion, which magnifies welfare losses of trade conflicts. Idea diffusion is mediated by the input-output structure of production, such that both sector cost shares and import trade shares characterize the source distribution of ideas. Using this framework, we explore the potential impact of a "decoupling of the global economy," a hypothetical scenario under which technology systems would diverge in the global economy. We divide the global economy into two geopolitical blocs -- East and West -- based on foreign policy similarity and model decoupling through an increase in iceberg trade costs (full decoupling) or tariffs (tariff decoupling). Results yield three main insights. First, the projected welfare losses for the global economy of a decoupling scenario can be drastic, as large as 15% in some regions and are largest in the lower income regions as they would benefit less from technology spillovers from richer areas. Second, the described size and pattern of welfare effects are specific to the model with diffusion of ideas. Without diffusion of ideas the size and variation across regions of the welfare losses would be substantially smaller. Third, a multi-sector framework exacerbates diffusion inefficiencies induced by trade costs relative to a single-sector one.
Effects of International Trade on World Agricultural Production and Productivity: Evidence from a Panel of 126 Countries 1962-2014

Lingran Yuan,Qizheng Zhang,Shuo Wang,Weibin Hu,Binlei Gong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22434/ifamr2021.0055

2018-01-01

Abstract:General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) was notable in largely excluding agriculture whereas the World Trade Organization (WTO) brought agriculture into the world trade rules. This article aims to evaluate the impacts of trade on agriculture production and productivity, especially the changes between the GATT and WTO periods. Using a panel of 126 countries from 1962-2014, this article derives not only spillover effects that were overlooked, but also provides more accurate productivity than was estimated with bias in literature for both periods. We find that trade hindered agriculture production and productivity in the GATT period but improved agriculture production and productivity in the WTO period.
Trade and Peace: the WTO Case

Qiuyue Huang,Zhiyuan Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2023.102072

IF: 4.744

2024-01-01

China Economic Review

Abstract:Investigating the impact of international trade on global peace assumes paramount significance given the current state of global political and economic instability, which is characterized by growing volatility and increased uncertainty. This paper empirically examines the impact of international trade on peace in the world and among different countries from the perspective of the World Trade Organization (WTO). Using data on interstate conflicts from 1950 to 2000, we find robust evidence that the international trade framework, represented by the WTO, reduces the probability and intensity of militarized interstate disputes, thereby making a significant contribution to the establishment and maintenance of global peace. The magnitude of this impact, however, varies depending on the geographical distance between nations, the extent of tariff concessions made by countries, and the changes in the institutional framework of the World Trade Organization. First, the WTO has the greatest impact on neighboring countries and those in close proximity, where the probability of conflicts is higher. Second, the peace-promoting effect of the WTO is significantly higher for developed countries that make greater tariff concessions compared to developing countries. Finally, changes in the WTO's institutional framework following the Uruguayan negotiations have diminished its effect in promoting peace. These results suggest that in order to mitigate the current concerns about global security, all countries must insist on expanding openness, deepening common interests, and avoiding engaging in direct military conflicts that would result in significant welfare losses.
Trade Wars along the Global Value Chains

Jiandong Ju,Hong Ma,Zi Wang,Xiaodong Zhu

2018-01-01

Abstract:We propose a multi-sector, multi-factor Krugman model with production linkages to quantify the consequences of the recent US-China trade conflicts. The model emphasizes the importance of high-tech or strategic sectors that (i) are skilled-intensive, (ii) utilize skilled-intensive inputs, (iii) have low elasticities of substitution across varieties within sector, and (iv) are not or little substitutable in producing other products. Semiconductor industry, one example of these strategic sectors, has drawn substantial attention in the recent trade conflicts. Our quantification suggests that these strategic industries could suffer disproportionately from trade conflicts. Considering the role of strategic industries in the global value chains, we find that the proposed US-China tariff war would decrease the U.S. real income by 0.43 percent and the China’s real income by 0.36 percent.
Liberalism and Interdependence: Extending the Trade-Conflict Model

Solomon W. Polachek,John Robst,Yuan-Ching Chang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343399036004002

1999-07-01

Journal of Peace Research

Abstract:The question of whether trade affects conflict is important for public policy. To date, theoretical studies have treated trade or the gains from trade as exogenous. However, a dyad's gains from trade are influenced by a number of factors, including foreign aid, tariffs, contiguity, and relative country size. This article presents a mathematical model to extend the conflict-trade model to incorporate foreign aid, tariffs, contiguity, and country size. In particular, we examine how the gains from trade are affected by these factors, with foreign aid, and contiguity increasing the gains from trade and tariffs reducing the gains from trade. Small countries have larger trade gains when trading with a large country than with a small country. If countries seek to protect their trade gains, the model predicts that foreign aid and contiguity will decrease conflict, while tariffs will increase conflict. The contiguity result suggests that conflict between neighboring countries would be greater than observed if not for the mitigating effects of trade. Trade with large countries decreases conflict more than trade with small countries. In addition, rather than concentrating solely on bilateral interactions, the models are specified in enough detail to garner implications concerning the effects of changes in the terms of trade on third parties. Empirical results, generally supporting the hypotheses, are presented using a sample from the Conflict and Peace Data Bank.

political science,international relations
The Impact of Trade Conflict on Developing Asia

Abdul Abiad,Kristina Baris,John Arvin Bernabe,Donald Jay Bertulfo,Sheila Camingue,Paul Neilmer Feliciano,Mahinthan Mariasingham,Valerie Mercer-Blackman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3339178

2018-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:This paper analyzes the effects of the current trade conflict on developing Asia using the Asian Development Bank’s Multiregional Input–Output Table (MRIOT), allowing us to calculate the impact on individual countries and on sectors within countries. The analysis estimates the direct impact on all tariff-affected goods; uses input–output analysis to estimate indirect effects on gross domestic product (GDP), exports, and employment; and allows for redirection of trade toward other producers using the approach of Feenstra and Sasahara (2017). A full escalation of the bilateral United States (US)–People’s Republic of China (PRC) trade conflict would shave 1% off PRC GDP and 0.2% off US GDP. The rest of developing Asia could see small net gains thanks to trade redirection, particularly in the electronics sector. A trade war in autos and parts would hurt the European Union and Japan. The conflict has substantial negative effects on PRC and US employment, but only minor impacts on current account balances.
Evaluating the Impact of the US–China Trade War

Ken Itakura

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aepr.12286

IF: 3

2019-08-30

Asian Economic Policy Review

Abstract:<p>We evaluate the impact of the US–China trade war using a dynamic computable general equilibrium (CGE) model of global trade. We conduct ex ante simulation analysis exploring three scenarios to understand how the trade war affects import tariffs, investment, and productivity. The escalation of the trade war reduces gross domestic product (GDP) in China and the USA by −1.41% and −1.35%, respectively. The trade war reduces nearly all sectoral imports and outputs in both countries. To reflect the important role of global value chains (GVCs), we modify the dynamic CGE model with agent‐specific import demands, and we explore the difference between the results for the two models relating to the trade war impacts on GDP and bilateral trade. When GVCs are accounted for, the negative impacts on bilateral trade are more widespread across countries, and world GDP in the modified model is reduced by −$US450 billion. These results suggest that the GVCs play substantial role in determining trade responses at the disaggregated level.</p>

economics
Economic Impacts of World Trade Organization Policies on Global Market Dynamics: An Econometric Perspective

Totok Hendarto,Sudjono,Endang Fatmawati,Loso Judijanto,Tekat Sukomardojo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54783/ijsoc.v6i3.1226

2024-07-26

International Journal of Science and Society

Abstract:This study embarks on an in-depth econometric analysis to unravel the economic impacts of World Trade Organization (WTO) policies on global market dynamics. Anchored in a robust quantitative framework, the research meticulously evaluates the extent to which WTO policies have influenced international trade patterns, market volatility, and economic growth across various regions. Utilizing a comprehensive dataset spanning multiple decades, the study employs advanced econometric techniques to dissect the intricate relationship between trade policies and global economic indicators. The findings reveal a nuanced interplay between WTO policies and market dynamics, highlighting significant variations in impact across different economic sectors and geographical regions. The analysis further delves into the implications of these policies on emerging economies, contrasting them with their effects on developed nations. The study concludes with critical insights into the role of WTO in shaping global economic landscapes, offering valuable implications for policymakers and stakeholders in international trade. This research contributes to the broader understanding of global economic interdependencies in the context of WTO policies, providing a foundation for future policy formulation and economic forecasting.
Estimating the Effect of GATT/WTO Membership on Domestic Armed Conflicts: A Propensity Score Matching Approach

Weizhun Mao

2012-01-01

Abstract:If GATT/WTO members had no GATT/WTO treatments, would there be some difference on their risks and incidence of their domestic conflicts compared with other states? In order to resolve the related question, this paper will apply Propensity Score Matching (PSM) to discuss the effect of GATT/WTO treatment on domestic conflict, with the aim of improving current causal inference on international trade institutions and internal conflicts. With the preliminary models, it finds GATT/WTO members usually have a lower risk and incidence of domestic conflicts about 85%-99% of that of non-member states. However, the robustness of the result is in doubt. The research furthermore indicates that a series of unobserved variables are still ignored in the relevant models, which finally bring a weak and highly sensitive relationship.
Price Transmission Analysis of the International Soybean Market in a Trade War Context

Gustavo Barboza Martignone,Karl Behrendt,Dimitrios Paparas,Barboza Martignone,Behrendt,Paparas

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10080203

2022-08-20

Economies

Abstract:This study analysed the dynamics of the international soybean market using econometric techniques and economic models to study the impacts of the US–China trade war. It considered the analysis of "spatial" (horizontal) price transmission during an approximately ten-year period from September 2009 to May 2019 using monthly time-series data. The research focused on the leaders in the international soybean market, namely, China, the USA, the EU, Brazil and Argentina. Several econometric techniques were employed. The stationarity of the price time series was determined using the augmented Dickey–Fuller (ADF) unit root test. Structural breaks were inferred using the ADF test with a breaks test and a Bai–Perron multiple break test. The long-term relation/cointegration amongst the series was determined using the Johansen cointegration test (1988), with the previous breaks input as dummy variables. The direction of the causality was inferred using the Granger causality test (1969). The long-term and short-term causal relations were determined using the vector autoregression model (VAR) and the vector error correction model (VECM). The results showed a highly efficient and cointegrated market. The incidents of the trade war, as represented by tariffs and subsidies, had minor effects on the market efficacy, cointegration and price transmission. The arbitrage process of the studied market managed to get around the tariffs. In other words, there was no empirical evidence to support the claim that the law of one price (LOOP) did not hold.
The impact of agricultural trade approaches on global economic modeling

Xin Zhao,Marshall A Wise,Stephanie T Waldhoff,G Page Kyle,Jonathan E Huster,Christopher W Ramig,Lauren E Rafelski,Pralit L Patel,Katherine V Calvin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102413

Abstract:Researchers explore future economic and climate scenarios using global economic and integrated assessment models to understand long-term interactions between human development and global environmental changes. However, differences in trade modeling approaches are an important source of uncertainty in these types of assessments, particularly for regional projections. In this study, we modified the Global Change Analysis Model (GCAM) to include a novel logit-based Armington trade structure, to examine two approaches to modeling trade: (1) an approach that represents segmented regional markets (SRM), and (2) an approach that represents integrated world markets (IWM). Our results demonstrate that assuming IWM, i.e., homogeneous product modeling and neglecting economic geography, could lead to lower cropland use (i.e., by 115 million hectares globally) and terrestrial carbon fluxes (i.e., by 25%) by the end of the century under the default GCAM scenario, compared with the logit-based Armington SRM structure. The results are highly heterogeneous across regions, with more pronounced regional trade responses driven by global market integration. Our study highlights the critical role that assumptions about future trade paradigms play in global economic and integrated assessment modeling. The results imply that closer harmonization of trade modeling approaches and trade parameter values could increase the convergence of regional results among models in model intercomparison studies.
Trade Wars and Their Impact on National Economies

Glib Zadorozhko,,Kostiantyn Kolesov,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15276/ej.01.2024.5

2024-03-27

Economic journal Odessa polytechnic university

Abstract:The article examines the impact of trade wars on the US and Chinese economies and their foreign economic relations. The analysis showed that throughout the considered period of 2016-2023, from the outside it looks like the US-China "war" is a normal trade dispute. China has declared its intention to become the sole leader in the world market not only of goods, but also of technologies. However, the real cause of the conflict is hidden in the global confrontation between the two leading economies, the purpose of which is the actual division of the world into new spheres of influence. To determine the impact of countries' exports on their GDP, appropriate regression models were built. The model for the USA showed that during the period 2000- 2021, the volume of exports from the USA to China had a decisive influence on the GDP of the USA. A similar model for China shows that the most powerful influence on China's GDP comes from the volume of its exports to the United States. Therefore, during the current part of the considered period, the economies of both countries are not only in a state of protracted trade war, but also depend on each other
Global and National Environmental Impacts of the US-China Trade War

Jianhong Lu,Xianqiang Mao,Mudan Wang,Zhengyan Liu,Peng Song

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c03863

2020-12-15

Abstract:The recent "US-China trade war" has aroused concern over trade-related environmental impacts. This study built a multiregional computable general equilibrium model to simulate environmental impacts of the "US-China trade war" under different scenarios of tariff and nontariff barriers and the battlefield spreading ranges. The present study found that although the trade war will cause a global economic downturn, which will seemingly reduce environmental pressure globally, global carbon emissions are expected to increase rather than decline. On the one hand, the CO2 emission increase caused by land-use changes in Brazil and Argentina will far exceed the emission reduction because of decreased global production. On the other hand, some countries/economies especially those developing countries such as Vietnam, Russia, and India will face emission increases driven by scale effects. Countries such as Korea, the UK, and France will enjoy a reduction in emissions driven by structural effects. China and the US will face a reduction in production and CO2 emissions, but their CO2 emission intensities will rise. The results remind us that as global production and supply chains are formed, it is important to closely monitor trade-related environmental impacts. Efforts should be made to balance the interests of trade and the environment.
Globalization? Trade War? A Counterbalance Perspective

Arthur Hu,Xingwei Hu,Hui Tong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2009.03436

2022-10-12

Abstract:The embrace of globalization and protectionism among economies has ebbed and flowed over the past few decades. These fluctuations call for quantitative analytics to help countries improve their trade policies. Changing attitudes about globalization also imply that the best trade policies may vary over time and be country-specific. We argue that the imports and exports of all economies constitute a counterbalanced network where conflict and cooperation are two sides of the same coin. Quantitative competitiveness is then formulated for each country using a network counterbalance equilibrium. A country could improve its relative strength in the network by embracing globalization, protectionism, trade collaboration, or conflict. This paper presents the necessary conditions for globalization and trade wars, evaluates their side effects, derives national bargaining powers, identifies appropriate targets for conflict or collaboration, and recommends fair resolutions for trade conflicts. Data and events from the past twenty years support these conditions.

General Economics
On the heterogeneous trade and welfare effects of GATT/WTO membership

Gabriel Felbermayr,Mario Larch,Erdal Yalcin,Yoto V. Yotov

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-023-00520-6

2024-01-29

Review of World Economics

Abstract:We quantify the effects of GATT/WTO membership on trade and welfare. Using an extensive database covering manufacturing trade for 186 countries over the period 1980–2016, we find that the average partial equilibrium impact of GATT/WTO membership on trade among member countries is large, positive, and significant. We contribute to the literature by estimating country-specific estimates and find them to vary widely across the countries in our sample with poorer members benefitting more. Using these estimates, we simulate the general equilibrium effects of GATT/WTO on welfare, which are sizable and heterogeneous across members. We show that countries not experiencing positive trade effects from joining GATT/WTO can still gain in terms of welfare, due to lower import prices and higher export demand.

economics,international relations
When Do Conflicting Political Relations Affect International Trade?

Scott L. Kastner

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002707302804

2007-08-01

Journal of Conflict Resolution

Abstract:Limited commercial integration between India and Pakistan or within much of the Middle East suggests that conflicting political interests between countries can have a detrimental effect on their economic relations. But rapidly growing economic ties between Mainland China and Taiwan show that commerce can also flourish even in the presence of very hostile relations. I explore this variation and hypothesize that the effects of international political conflict on trade are less severe in cases where internationalist economic interests have relatively strong political clout domestically. Simple quantitative tests on a sample of seventy-six countries over the years 1961 to 1992 are supportive; further evidence is provided via a brief case study of Mainland China-Taiwan relations.

political science,international relations
Trade wars and trade disputes: The role of equity and political support

Eddy Bekkers,Joseph F. Francois,Douglas R. Nelson,Hugo Rojas‐Romagosa

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.12742

IF: 1.234

2024-04-04

Review of International Economics

Abstract:Recent theoretical and quantitative analysis of trade wars is grounded in a relatively narrow treatment of optimal tariff theory and noncooperative Nash equilibria. The lynchpin of this approach is the assumption that trade policy makers are rational and have a simple well‐established objective function to optimize. We argue that the preferred specification of this objective function ignores inequality at its peril. We work with a quantitative trade model, introducing a comprehensive tariff‐space grid search new to the literature. This allows us to explicitly check for the presence of multiple Nash outcomes. We show that including income inequality—a primary focus of the earlier literature—as a determinant of social welfare can substantially change noncooperative Nash outcomes. We also show that the optimal tariff of the US falls by half when the social welfare function includes inequality as an objective. Hence, the economic outcomes of actual trade wars may be very different from what recent estimates grounded in optimal tariff theory would suggest.

economics
Globalization and wartime trade

Tal Sadeh,Nizan Feldman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836719896613

2020-01-06

Cooperation and Conflict

Abstract:This article argues that on balance globalization does not increase, and may even reduce, the opportunity cost of Militarized Interstate Disputes (MIDs), as measured by foregone merchandise trade. Specifically, globalization makes it easier for states to substitute trade partners, makes it difficult to employ trade sanctions, makes credit more available to states at conflict, and encourages trade-substituting horizontal Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) and sanctions-resilient vertical FDI. Hypotheses are supported using High Dimensional Fixed Effects regression, applied to a Gravity model, with two-way clustering of standard errors, and an analysis of the effect of globalization on the marginal effect of MIDs on international trade. This suggests that while wars are becoming infrequent in recent decades, due to other factors, trade’s contribution to peace is diminishing.

political science,international relations
International R&D Collaboration and Strategic Trade Policy

Baomin Dong,Huasheng Song,Xiaolin Qian

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12201

2016-01-01

Review of Development Economics

Abstract:We study an international trade model with symmetric countries and symmetric firms, with countries making strategic trade policies, anticipating the decisions of firms on R&D collaboration at the subsequent stage. In general we should observe a conflict between the equilibrium outcome and the efficient one. We find that an asymmetric outcome where one country unilaterally liberalizes trade while the other does not is likely to occur. We also find that while banning international R&D collaboration may help to reach free trade equilibrium in certain situations, it provides little assistance in reaching the outcome that maximizes global welfare.
The Global Value Chain and Welfare Effects of Tariffs—Counterfactual Analysis of Sino–US Economic and Trade Frictions

Mengzhou Qin,Zijie Fan,Yuan Zhong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148280

IF: 3.9

2022-07-06

Sustainability

Abstract:This paper aims to study the impact of Sino–US (China–United States) trade frictions on global value chains and welfare changes. We introduce the general equilibrium model for multi-country and multi-sector heterogeneous enterprises and combine it with an input–output structure. The results show that the additional tariffs on China and the US reduce bilateral trade and affect the overall imports and exports of both countries to varying degrees. The results show that the additional tariffs on China and the US affect both countries' overall imports and exports to varying degrees. The impact of the trade of manufactured goods is greater than that of the trade of intermediate goods. The welfare effect in China has dropped by 0.163%, while the corresponding effect in the US has improved by 0.016%. The main reason for the decline in China's welfare is the deterioration of the terms of trade. Increased tariffs between China and the US can reduce bilateral trade between the two countries, particularly in intermediate goods, and can cause a reorganization of global value chains in both regions.

environmental sciences,environmental studies,green & sustainable science & technology

Potential Economic Effects of a Global Trade Conflict

The Impact of Geopolitical Conflicts on Trade, Growth, and Innovation

Effects of International Trade on World Agricultural Production and Productivity: Evidence from a Panel of 126 Countries 1962-2014

Trade and Peace: the WTO Case

Trade Wars along the Global Value Chains

Liberalism and Interdependence: Extending the Trade-Conflict Model

The Impact of Trade Conflict on Developing Asia

Evaluating the Impact of the US–China Trade War

Economic Impacts of World Trade Organization Policies on Global Market Dynamics: An Econometric Perspective

Estimating the Effect of GATT/WTO Membership on Domestic Armed Conflicts: A Propensity Score Matching Approach

Price Transmission Analysis of the International Soybean Market in a Trade War Context

The impact of agricultural trade approaches on global economic modeling

Trade Wars and Their Impact on National Economies

Global and National Environmental Impacts of the US-China Trade War

Globalization? Trade War? A Counterbalance Perspective

On the heterogeneous trade and welfare effects of GATT/WTO membership

When Do Conflicting Political Relations Affect International Trade?

Trade wars and trade disputes: The role of equity and political support

Globalization and wartime trade

International R&D Collaboration and Strategic Trade Policy

The Global Value Chain and Welfare Effects of Tariffs—Counterfactual Analysis of Sino–US Economic and Trade Frictions