Mirrors without warnings

Roman Frigg,James Nguyen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02222-9
IF: 1.595
2019-05-21
Synthese
Abstract:Abstract Veritism, the position that truth is necessary for epistemic acceptability, seems to be in tension with the observation that much of our best science is not, strictly speaking, true when interpreted literally. This generates a paradox: (1) truth is necessary for epistemic acceptability; (2) the claims of science have to be taken literally; (3) much of what science produces is not literally true and yet it is acceptable. We frame Elgin’s project in True Enough as being motivated by, and offering a particular resolution to, this paradox. We discuss the paradox with a focus on scientific models and argue that there is another resolution available which is compatible with retaining veritism: rejecting the idea that scientific models should be interpreted literally.
history & philosophy of science
What problem does this paper attempt to address?