Tailoring restoration interventions to the grassland‐savanna‐forest complex in central Brazil

Isabel B. Schmidt,Maxmiller C. Ferreira,Alexandre B. Sampaio,Bruno M. T. Walter,Daniel L. M. Vieira,Karen D. Holl

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12981

2019-06-27

Restoration Ecology

Abstract:<p>Defining the reference system for restoration projects in regions characterized by complex vegetation mosaics is challenging. Misidentification of anthropogenically‐degraded grasslands or savannas as natural vegetation can lead to inappropriate restoration efforts and legislation. Here we use the Cerrado region of Brazil as an example of the importance of clearly defining multiple natural and anthropogenically‐altered states in grassland‐savanna‐forest mosaics to set appropriate restoration targets and select cost‐effective restoration methods. We contend that the differences in Cerrado vegetation composition originally were driven by soil conditions and secondarily by fire frequency and precipitation patterns that differ across the region. Grasslands are found on the shallowest, least fertile soils and/or in waterlogged soils; scleromorphic forest (<i>cerradão</i>) are generally found on deeper, more fertile soils; and savannas occupy an intermediate position. This biophysical template has been overlain by a range of human land use intensities that strongly affect resilience. We define three main, natural vegetation types – grassland, savanna, and scleromorphic forest ‐ to (1) distinguish between original and degraded states and (2) set appropriate targets for and guide restoration. For example, areas that were originally scleromorphic forest are likely to regenerate naturally following low or medium intensity land use due extensive resprouting of woody plants, whereas grassland restoration requires reintroduction of grass and forb species that do not tolerate soil disturbance and exotic grass competition. Planting trees into historic grasslands results in inappropriate restoration targets and often restoration failure. Correctly identifying original vegetation types is critical to most effectively allocate scarce restoration funding.</p><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.</p>

ecology