Anti-Ku syndrome with elevated CK and anti-Ku syndrome with anti-dsDNA are two distinct entities with different outcomes

Lionel Spielmann,Benoit Nespola,François Séverac,Emmanuel Andres,Romain Kessler,Aurélien Guffroy,Vincent Poindron,Thierry Martin,Bernard Geny,Jean Sibilia,Alain Meyer
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214439
IF: 27.973
2019-05-24
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Abstract:Objective To refine the spectrum of anti-Ku-associated disease, a condition that is equivocally described by current diagnostic criteria for connective tissue diseases. Methods Among 42 consecutive patients harbouring anti-Ku antibodies, subgroups with similar phenotypes and prognosis were delineated without an a priori diagnosis using hierarchical clustering analysis of the cumulative clinico-biological features recorded during the follow-up. Features present at baseline that most efficiently predicted the outcomes were then identified using a sensitivity–specificity sum maximisation approach. Results Clinico-biological features were clustered into three groups. Glomerulonephritis and ILD, the two fatal complications in this cohort, were unequally distributed between the three clusters that additionally differed on six clinico-biological features. Among features present at baseline, elevated serum level of creatine kinase (CK) and anti-dsDNA antibodies were generally mutually exclusive and most efficiently predicted the cluster belonging at last follow-up. Anti-Ku patients with elevated CK had a 22-fold higher risk of ILD while anti-Ku patients with anti-dsDNA antibodies had a 13-fold higher risk of glomerulonephritis Conclusion “Anti-Ku with elevated CK” syndrome and “anti-Ku with anti-dsDNA” syndrome represent two distinct entities that are important to recognise in order to best tailor patient care.
rheumatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?