A LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY MASS SPECTROMETRY METHOD FOR THE DETERMINATION OF SOME PHARMACOLOGICALLY ACTIVE SUBSTANCES VALIDATED USING MILK AS A MATRIX
Rose Kibechu,Kwenga Sichilongo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10826076.2011.621497
2012-07-03
Journal of Liquid Chromatography and Related Technologies
Abstract:Two QuEChERS kits originally designed for the extraction of pesticides in foods and foods of plant origin have been compared for the extraction efficiency of different analytes other than pesticides. Six veterinary drugs that have been prohibited for use in foods of animal origin were studied using milk as a matrix and LC-MS as a separation and detection mode. The Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) and the European Standard EN QuEChERS kits were compared after optimization of key parameters for extraction of chloramphenicol, metronidazole, chlorpromazine, dimetridazole, ronidazole, and dapsone. The EN QuEChERS kit was superior over the AOAC kit in terms of recoveries: (in brackets are % recoveries) chloramphenicol (79), metronidazole (55), chlorpromazine (93), dimetridazole (97), ronidazole (65), and dapsone (69). Using the AOAC kit gave the following values: (in brackets are % recoveries) chloramphenicol (71), metronidazole (66), chlorpromazine (60), dimetridazole (49), ronidazole (37), and dapsone (33). Additionally, three mass spectrometry scan modes, that is, full scan, SIM, and MS/MS were compared. Results showed that SIM was superior over full scan and MS/MS as in the case of chloramphenicol whose method detection limit (MDL) value was 16.3 µg/kg in the SIM mode and 28.2 µg/kg in the full scan mode.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?