Abstract:There are three models on the structure of Chinese governance ,all taking account of the central government ’ s objectives about governance efficiency and political stability at the same time .They are the“administrative subcontract system” model by Zhou Li‐An ,the model of“centralized personal controls at the national level , and decentralized ruling over the people regionally” by Cao Zhenghan ,and the“empire’ s governance logic” model by Zhou Xueguang . All three models have significant divergences in terms of whether the two objectives of efficiency and stability of the central government can be compatible or not .Zhou Li‐An and Cao Zhenghan argue that the two objectives are compatible in specific governance structure ,which is not shared by Zhou Xueguang who argues that the co‐existence of centralization and decentralization cannot lead to a stable structure and the two processes are subject to cyclical adjustment and cyclic fluctuation .And also , the analyses of the three models focus on different levels . The “administrative subcontract system”model and the“empire’ s governance logic” model mainly discuss the governance structure and mechanism of the different levels of governments within the bureaucratic system , while the model of “centralized personal controls at the national level , and decentralized ruling over the people regionally” focuses on how the way of central government dealing with the public shapes the basic structure of decentralization . The divergences are caused by two reasons . First , these three models hold different assumptions about whether the rule over the military and the people can be separated . Second ,there exists the disagreement about which one is the critical source of political risks between decentralization itself (e .g . the local governments’ behaviors as deviation ,out of control ,etc .) and the public (e .g .the public’s behaviors as protest ,opposition ,confrontation ,etc .) .

Decision-Making and Risk Sources: Key to Source Governance for Social Stability

Political Risk of Centralization and the Vertical Separation of Powers:Reform of Contemporary Social Management System from a Historical Perspective

Political Risks and Decentralization:The Comparison of Three Models on Chinese Governance

Institutional Reasoning and Theoretical Structure for the Risk Assessment of Social Stability

Factors Contributing to Social Risk Management in China: Evaluation in the Context of SSRA Initiative

Policy Gap, Risk Origin and Social Stability Risk Assessment

Big Data Model for Third-party Stability Assessment of Major Decisions: Generation Logic and Path Construction

Social stability risk assessment and economic competitiveness in China

Eight Views of Social Management Innovation: Based on the Social Risk Perspective

Ethical Decision Studies Based on Risk Consideration

Source Governance of Social Disputes in China

Social Risk Assessment Index System by Composite Catastrophe Models: A Case Study in Contemporary China

From Stability Maintenance to Participation:Theory Sources and Measure Studies of Social Stability Risk Assessment

From Assessment to Monitoring:A New Strategy to Cope with Social Stability Risk

The Risk Communication Mechanism in the Social Stability Risk Assessment of Major Public Policies---A Case Study on the Water Price Adjustment Policy of Beijing

Evolutionary Mechanism and Coping Method Transform from Environmental Risk to Social Risk

Prevention and Control of Decision-making Risk in Deepening Education Reform

A NOVEL DECISION-MAKING FRAMEWORK BASED ON PROBABILISTIC LINGUISTIC TERM SET FOR SELECTING SUSTAINABLE SUPPLIER CONSIDERING SOCIAL CREDIT

On the Social Stability Risk Assessment of Key Projects

The Dynamic Mechanism of Manipulative Behavior in the Policy Implementation of China Local Social Stability Risk Assessment:An Evolutionary Game Test

The Science and Democracy of Administrative Policy in a Risk Society