Abstract:BackgroundSystematic literature searching is recognised as a critical component of the systematic review process. It involves a systematic search for studies and aims for a transparent report of study identification, leaving readers clear about what was done to identify studies, and how the findings of the review are situated in the relevant evidence.Information specialists and review teams appear to work from a shared and tacit model of the literature search process. How this tacit model has developed and evolved is unclear, and it has not been explicitly examined before.The purpose of this review is to determine if a shared model of the literature searching process can be detected across systematic review guidance documents and, if so, how this process is reported in the guidance and supported by published studies.MethodA literature review.Two types of literature were reviewed: guidance and published studies. Nine guidance documents were identified, including: The Cochrane and Campbell Handbooks. Published studies were identified through ‘pearl growing’, citation chasing, a search of PubMed using the systematic review methods filter, and the authors’ topic knowledge.The relevant sections within each guidance document were then read and re-read, with the aim of determining key methodological stages. Methodological stages were identified and defined. This data was reviewed to identify agreements and areas of unique guidance between guidance documents. Consensus across multiple guidance documents was used to inform selection of ‘key stages’ in the process of literature searching.ResultsEight key stages were determined relating specifically to literature searching in systematic reviews. They were: who should literature search, aims and purpose of literature searching, preparation, the search strategy, searching databases, supplementary searching, managing references and reporting the search process.ConclusionsEight key stages to the process of literature searching in systematic reviews were identified. These key stages are consistently reported in the nine guidance documents, suggesting consensus on the key stages of literature searching, and therefore the process of literature searching as a whole, in systematic reviews. Further research to determine the suitability of using the same process of literature searching for all types of systematic review is indicated.

A narrative literature review process for an academic business research thesis

The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know?

Revisiting the need for a literature search narrative: A brief methodological note

Writing narrative style literature reviews

Narrative reanalysis: A methodological framework for a new brand of reviews

Literature Reviews for Education and Nursing Graduate Students

PhD Thesis Writing Process: A Systematic Approach—How to Write Your Literature Review

The art of crafting a systematic literature review in entrepreneurship research

Reviewing the animal literature: how to describe and choose between different types of literature reviews

The application of theory in literature reviews – illustrated with examples from supply chain management

The Science of Literature Reviews: Searching, Identifying, Selecting, and Synthesising

A Guided Tour of Literature Review: Facilitating Academic Paper Reading with Narrative Visualization.

Defining the process to literature searching in systematic reviews: a literature review of guidance and supporting studies

Literature Review in Scientific Research: An Overview

Literature reviews as independent studies: guidelines for academic practice

A practical guide to data analysis in general literature reviews

Designing the literature review: Historical, narrative, theoretical, integrative, and scoping reviews

Developing literature review writing and citation practices through an online writing tutorial series: Corpus-based evidence

The doctorate in pieces: a scoping review of research on the PhD thesis by publication

Conducting and Writing a Structured Literature Review in Human Resource Development

Towards a Maturity Model for Systematic Literature Review Process