Abstract:BACKGROUND: Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is commonly used to treat patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema (ACPE), but the findings of a recent large clinical trial suggest that NIV may be less effective for ACPE than previously thought.PURPOSE: To provide an estimate of the effect of NIV on clinical outcomes in patients with ACPE that incorporates recent trial evidence and explore ways to interpret that evidence in the context of preceding evidence that favors NIV.DATA SOURCES: PubMed and EMBASE from 1966 to December 2009, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and conference proceedings through December 2009, and reference lists, without language restriction.STUDY SELECTION: Randomized trials that compared continuous positive airway pressure and bilevel ventilation with standard therapy or each other.DATA EXTRACTION: Two independent reviewers extracted data. Outcomes examined were mortality, intubation rate, and incidence of new myocardial infarction (MI).DATA SYNTHESIS: Compared with standard therapy, continuous positive airway pressure reduced mortality (relative risk [RR], 0.64 [95% CI, 0.44 to 0.92]) and need for intubation (RR, 0.44 [CI, 0.32 to 0.60]) but not incidence of new MI (RR, 1.07 [CI, 0.84 to 1.37]). The effect was more prominent in trials in which myocardial ischemia or infarction caused ACPE in higher proportions of patients (RR, 0.92 [CI, 0.76 to 1.10] when 10% of patients had ischemia or MI vs. 0.43 [CI, 0.17 to 1.07] when 50% had ischemia or MI). Bilevel ventilation reduced the need for intubation (RR, 0.54 [CI, 0.33 to 0.86]) but did not reduce mortality or new MI. No differences were detected between continuous positive airway pressure and bilevel ventilation on any clinical outcomes for which they were directly compared.LIMITATIONS: The quality of the evidence base was limited. Definitions, cause, and severity of ACPE differed among the trials, as did patient characteristics and clinical settings.CONCLUSION: Although a recent large trial contradicts results from previous studies, the evidence in aggregate still supports the use of NIV for patients with ACPE. Continuous positive airway pressure reduces mortality more in patients with ACPE secondary to acute myocardial ischemia or infarction.PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: None.

Morphine Use in the Treatment of Acute Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema and Its Effects on Patient Outcome: A Systematic Review

The Safety of Morphine in Patients with Acute Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis

Low dose of morphine to relieve dyspnea in acute respiratory failure: the OpiDys double-blind randomized controlled trial

Midazolam versus morphine in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema patients with and without atrial fibrillation: findings from the MIMO trial

Morphine and Cardiovascular Outcomes among Patients with Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Coronary Angiography.

[Efficacy of Noninvasive Ventilation on In-Hospital Mortality in Patients with Acute Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema: a Meta-Analysis].

Comparative Efficacy of Fentanyl and Morphine in Patients with or At Risk for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study

Intravenous morphine administration and reperfusion success in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: insights from cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

Effects of midazolam vs morphine in patients with acute pulmonary edema with left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a secondary analysis of data from the MIMO trial

Morphine for dyspnoea in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a before-after efficacy study

Morphine and myocardial ischaemia-reperfusion

The Influence of Acute Morphine Use on Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis

Intrathecal Morphine for Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Efficacy and safety of non-invasive ventilation in the treatment of acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema – a systematic review and meta-analysis

The effect of acute exposure to morphine on breathing variability and cardiopulmonary coupling in men with obstructive sleep apnea: A randomized controlled trial.

Should Noninvasive Ventilation Be Used for Treatment of Acute Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema? A Cochrane Review Summary With Commentary

A systematic review of the use of opioids in the management of dyspnoea

Meta-analysis: Noninvasive Ventilation in Acute Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema

The effect of acute morphine on obstructive sleep apnoea: a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled crossover trial

Morphine versus methylprednisolone or aminophylline for relieving dyspnea in patients with advanced cancer in China: a retrospective study

Effects of morphine, methylprednisolone and aminophylline on management of dyspnea in patients with advanced cancer