Abstract:Online social networks have emerged as a significant platform for political discourse. In this paper we investigate what affects the level of participation of users in the political discussion. Specifically, are users more likely to be active when they are surrounded by like-minded individuals, or, alternatively, when their environment is heterogeneous, and so their messages might be carried to people with differing views. To answer this question, we analyzed the activity of about 200K Twitter users who expressed explicit support for one of the candidates of the 2012 US presidential election. We quantified the level of political activity (PA) of users by the fraction of political tweets in their posts, and analyzed the relationship between PA and measures of the users' political environment. These measures were designed to assess the likemindedness, e.g., the fraction of users with similar political views, of their virtual and geographic environments. Our results showed that high PA is usually obtained by users in politically balanced virtual environment. This is in line with the disagreement theory of political science that states that a user's PA is invigorated by the disagreement with their peers. Our results also show that users surrounded by politically like-minded virtual peers tend to have low PA. This observation contradicts the echo chamber amplification theory that states that a person tends to be more politically active when surrounded by like-minded people. Finally, we observe that the likemindedness of the geographical environment does not affect PA. We thus conclude that PA of users is independent of the likemindedness of their geographical environment and is correlated with likemindedness of their virtual environment. The exact form of correlation manifests the phenomenon of disagreement and, in a majority of settings, contradicts the echo chamber amplification theory.

Can celebrity athletes burst the echo chamber bubble? The case of LeBron James and Lady Gaga

When Celebrities Endorse Politicians: Analyzing the Behavior of Celebrity Followers in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election

Sporting the government: Twitter as a window into sportspersons' engagement with causes in India and USA

Dismantling Hate: Understanding Hate Speech Trends Against NBA Athletes

The echo chamber effect on social media

“Stick to Sports” is Gone: A Field Theory Analysis of Sports Journalists’ Coverage of Socio-political Issues

Do not shut up and do dribble: social media and TV consumption

‘You’re born to be brave’: Lady Gaga’s use of social media to inspire fans’ political awareness

Do Fans Care About the Activist Athlete? A Closer Look at Athlete Activism Effect on Brand Image

“Doing What’s Best for Me”: A Cultural Values Comparison of Social Media Responses to Kyrie Irving’s COVID-19 Vaccination Status

Retweets Amplify the Echo Chamber Effect

Understanding following patterns among high-performance athletes

What Color is a Golden Boy? The Glorification and Disparagement of Male Superstar Athletes in Sports Illustrated

Celebrity Politics and Democratic Elitism

Cross-Partisan Discussions on YouTube: Conservatives Talk to Liberals but Liberals Don't Talk to Conservatives

A big data analysis of social media coverage of athlete protests

COVID-19 and social media: Beyond polarization

More Voices Than Ever? Quantifying Media Bias in Networks

How Tweet It Is: A Gendered Analysis of Professional Tennis Players’ Self-Presentation on Twitter

We can’t just shut up and play: How the NBA and WNBA are helping dismantle systemic racism

Echo chamber amplification and disagreement effects in the political activity of Twitter users