Abstract:Background: An effective newborn hearing screening programme has low referral rate and low loss to follow-up (LTFU) rate after referral from initial screening. This systematic review identified studies evaluating the effect of protocol and programme factors on these two outcomes, including the screening method used and the infant group. Methods: Five databases were searched (latest: April 2021). Included studies reported original data from newborn hearing screening and described the target outcomes against a protocol or programme level factor. Studies were excluded if results were only available for one risk condition, for each ear, or for < 100 infants, or if methodological bias was observed. Included studies were evaluated for quality across three domains: sample, screening and outcome, using modified criteria from the Ottawa-Newcastle and QUADAS-2 scales. Findings from the included studies were synthesised in tables, figures and text. Results: Fifty-eight studies reported on referral rate, 8 on LTFU rate, and 35 on both. Only 15 studies defined LTFU. Substantial diversity in referral and LTFU rate was observed across studies. Twelve of fourteen studies that evaluated screening method showed lower referral rates with aABR compared to TEOAE for well babies (WB). Rescreening before hospital discharge and screening after 3 days of age reduced referral rates. Studies investigating LTFU reported lower rates for programmes that had audiologist involvement, did not require fees for step 2, were embedded in a larger regional or national programme, and scheduled follow-up in a location accessible to the families. In programmes with low overall LTFU, higher LTFU was observed for infants from the NICU compared to WB. Conclusion: Although poor reporting and exclusion of non-English articles may limit the generalisability from this review, key influential factors for referral and LTFU rates were identified. Including aABR in WB screening can effectively reduce referral rates, but it is not the only solution. The reported referral and LTFU rates vary largely across studies, implying the contribution of several parameters identified in this review and the context in which the programme is performed. Extra attention should be paid to infants with higher risk for hearing impairment to ensure their return to follow-up.

Correction: A proposal for comprehensive newborn hearing screening to improve identification of deaf and hard-of-hearing children

Corrigendum: Hearing rehabilitation of adults with auditory processing disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current evidence-based interventions

Corrigendum: Auditory tests for characterizing hearing deficits in listeners with various hearing abilities: The BEAR test battery

Erratum: Cochlear Implantation in Noonan Syndrome With and Without Multiple Lentigines: A Case Report and Systematic Review: Erratum

Erratum: Methods for measuring and identifying sounds in the intensive care unit

Corrigendum: Children's neural sensitivity to prosodic features of natural speech and its significance to speech development in cochlear implanted children

Corrigendum: Protocol for a prospective multicenter longitudinal randomized controlled trial (CALIN) of sensory-tonic stimulation to foster parent child interactions and social cognition in very premature infants

Erratum: The Rise and Fall of Aural Acoustic Immittance Assessment Tools

Author Correction: BHMT Polymorphism and Susceptibility to PTE in Chinese Patients.

Protocol and programme factors associated with referral and loss to follow-up from newborn hearing screening: a systematic review

Erratum: Reintubation Rate between Nasal High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation versus Synchronized Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation in Neonates: A Parallel Randomized Controlled Trial

Corrigendum For: Levels of Folate Receptor Autoantibodies in Maternal and Cord Blood and Risk of Neural Tube Defects in a Chinese Population, 106:685–695 (10.1002/Bdra.23517)

Newborn hearing screening program in China: a narrative review of the issues in screening and management

Erratum: Toward standardization, harmonization, and integration of social determinants of health data: A Texas Clinical and Translational Science Award institutions collaboration - CORRIGENDUM

Corrigendum: Current phenotypic and genetic spectrum of syndromic deafness in Tunisia: paving the way for precision auditory health

[Hearing screening of 10,501 newborns]

Correction to: The development of a healing model of care for an Indigenous drug and alcohol residential rehabilitation service: a community-based participatory research approach

Twelve years of neonatal hearing screening: audiological and etiological results

Newborn Hearing Screening Success... Patient Care Failure

Corrigendum: Precision medicine: a new era for inner ear diseases

Development of an Effective Public Health Screening Program to Assess Hearing Disabilities among Newborns in Shanghai: A Prospective Cohort Study