Differences Between GH- and PRL-Cosecreting and GH-Secreting Pituitary Adenomas: a Series of 604 Cases
Marta Araujo-Castro,Betina Biagetti,Edelmiro Menéndez Torre,Iría Novoa-Testa,Fernando Cordido,Eider Pascual Corrales,Víctor Rodríguez Berrocal,Fernando Guerrero-Pérez,Almudena Vicente,Juan Carlos Percovich,Rogelio García Centeno,Laura González,María Dolores Ollero García,Ana Irigaray Echarri,María Dolores Moure Rodríguez,Cristina Novo-Rodríguez,María Calatayud,Rocío Villar,Ignacio Bernabéu,Cristina Alvarez-Escola,Pamela Benítez Valderrama,Carmen Tenorio-Jimenéz,Pablo Abellán Galiana,Eva Venegas Moreno,Inmaculada González Molero,Pedro Iglesias,Concepción Blanco,Fernando Vidal-Ostos De Lara,Paz de Miguel,Elena López Mezquita,Felicia Hanzu,Iban Aldecoa,Cristina Lamas,Silvia Aznar,Anna Aulinas,Anna Calabrese,Paola Gracia,José María Recio-Córdova,Mariola Aviles,Diego Asensio-Wandosel,Miguel Sampedro,Ignacio Ruz-Caracuel,Rosa Camara,Miguel Paja,Carmen Fajardo-Montañana,Mónica Marazuela,Manel Puig-Domingo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgae126
2024-03-04
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Abstract:Abstract Context Few data exist about the clinical course of acromegaly, surgical and medical outcomes in patients with GH- and prolactin cosecreting pituitary adenomas (GH&PRL-PAs). Nevertheless, some series described a more aggressive clinic-radiological behavior than in growth hormone–secreting pituitary adenomas (GH-PAs). Objective This work aims to evaluate differences in clinical presentation and in surgical outcomes between GH-PAs and GH&PRL-PAs. Methods A multicenter retrospective study was conducted of 604 patients with acromegaly who underwent pituitary surgery. Patients were classified into 2 groups according to serum PRL levels at diagnosis and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for PRL: a) GH&PRL-PAs when PRL levels were above the upper limit of normal (ULN) and IHC for GH and PRL was positive or PRL levels were greater than 100 ng/dL and PRL IHC was not available (n = 130) and b) GH-PA patients who did not meet the previously mentioned criteria (n = 474). Results GH&PRL-PAs represented 21.5% (n = 130) of patients with acromegaly. The mean age at diagnosis was lower in GH&PRL-PAs than in GH-PAs (P < .001). GH&PRL-PAs were more frequently macroadenomas (90.6% vs 77.4%; P = .001) and tended to be more invasive (33.6% vs 24.7%; P = .057) than GH-PAs. Furthermore, they had presurgical hypopituitarism more frequently (odds ratio 2.8; 95% CI, 1.83-4.38). Insulin-like growth factor ULN levels at diagnosis were lower in patients with GH&PRL-PAs (median 2.4 [interquartile range (IQR) 1.73-3.29] vs 2.7 [IQR 1.91-3.67]; P = .023). There were no differences in the immediate (41.1% vs 43.3%; P = .659) or long-term postsurgical acromegaly biochemical cure rate (53.5% vs 53.1%; P = .936) between groups. However, there was a higher incidence of permanent arginine-vasopressin deficiency (AVP-D) (7.3% vs 2.4%; P = .011) in GH&PRL-PA patients. Conclusion GH&PRL-PAs are responsible for 20% of acromegaly cases. These tumors are more invasive, larger, and cause hypopituitarism more frequently than GH-PAs and are diagnosed at an earlier age. The biochemical cure rate is similar between both groups, but patients with GH&PRL-PAs tend to develop permanent postsurgical AVP-D more frequently.
endocrinology & metabolism