Comparing the yield of oropharyngeal swabs and sputum for detection of 11 common pathogens in hospitalized children with lower respiratory tract infection

Le Wang,Shuo Yang,Xiaotong Yan,Teng Liu,Zhishan Feng,Guixia Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-019-1177-x
IF: 5.916
2019-06-24
Virology Journal
Abstract:<h3 class="Heading">Background</h3><p class="Para">Advances in molecular laboratory techniques are changing the prospects for the diagnosis of viral infectious diseases. Multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay (multiplex-PCR) can detect dozens of pathogens simultaneously, greatly reducing turnaround time (TAT) and improving detection sensitivity. But as a double-edged sword, due to the high sensitivity of PCR, the type of respiratory specimens is critical to diagnosis. In this work, we performed a head-to-head comparison to evaluate the multiplex-PCR yields between two samples, sputum and flocked oropharyngeal swabs (OPS).</p><h3 class="Heading">Methods</h3><p class="Para">Eleven common respiratory pathogens were tested in hospitalized children</p><h3 class="Heading">Results</h3><p class="Para">From January to June 2018, 440 children with paired OPS and sputum were tested. The positive rate was 84% (369/440) for OPS and 88% (386/440) for sputum (<em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">p</em> = .007). The frequency of detection of HRV, RSV, Influenza A virus, HMPV, parainfluenza virus, adenovirus, <em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">M. pneumoniae,</em> coronavirus, bocavirus and <em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">C. pneumoniae</em> in sputa was higher than that of OPSs (all <em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">p</em> Mycoplasma pneumonia (κ = 0.61) and <em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">Chlamydia pneumoniae</em> (κ = 0.24) Additionally, 79.3% (349/440) of cases showed consistent results between the two types of samples, and they were significantly younger than patients with inconsistent results (<em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">p</em> = .002).</p><h3 class="Heading">Conclusions</h3><p class="Para">Flocked oropharyngeal swabs and sputum performed similarly for the detection of common respiratory pathogens in hospitalized children by multiplex-PCR, except for <em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">Mycoplasma pneumoniae</em> and <em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">Chlamydia pneumoniae</em>. Young patients are likely to have consistent results between the two specimens.</p>
virology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?