Real-World Evidence from the Integrative Medicine Primary Care Trial (IMPACT): Assessing Patient-Reported Outcomes at Baseline and 12-Month Follow-Up

Robert L. Crocker,Jason T. Hurwitz,Amy J. Grizzle,Ivo Abraham,Rick Rehfeld,Randy Horwitz,Andrew T. Weil,Victoria Maizes
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8595409
2019-06-26
Abstract:Purpose . The University of Arizona Integrative Health Center (UAIHC) was an innovative membership-supported integrative medicine (IM) adult primary care clinic in Phoenix, Arizona. UAIHC delivered healthcare using an integrative medicine model that combined conventional and complementary medical treatments, including nutrition, mind-body medicine, acupuncture, manual medicine, health coaching, educational classes, and groups. Results from pre-post evaluation of patient-reported outcomes on several standardized measures are presented here. Methods . UAIHC patients completed surveys at baseline and after 12 months of continuous integrative primary care. Patients reported on perceived changes in health outcomes as measured by Short-Form Health Survey ( SF-12 general, mental, and physical health), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS4) , Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI) , World Health Organization Well-Being Index (WHO-5 ), Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) , Fatigue Severity Scale (VAS; FSS) , Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD2) , Patient Health Questionnaire for depression (PHQ2), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) global rating of sleep quality, and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS ; nutrition, exercise, and physical activity). Overall differences between time points were assessed for statistical significance. Patient demographics are also described. Results . 177 patients completed baseline and follow-up outcome measures. Patients were predominantly white, female, college-educated, and employed. Baseline to one-year follow-up results indicate statistically significant improvements ( p < .05) on all but perceived stress ( PSS-4 ) and work absenteeism ( WPAI ). Clinical impact and/or practical effects are reported as percent change or standardized effect sizes whenever possible. Other demographic and descriptive information is summarized. Conclusions . Following one year of IM primary care at UAIHC, patient-reported outcomes indicated positive impacts in several areas of patients’ lives: mental, physical, and overall health; work productivity; sleep quality; pain; fatigue; overall well-being; and physical activity.
integrative & complementary medicine
What problem does this paper attempt to address?