Abstract:Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the role of industry peers in shaping firm debt maturity decisions. Design/methodology/approach – The authors use idiosyncratic equity shocks as instruments to disentangle industry fixed and peer effects. The authors also employ a three-stage least squares regression (3SLS) model to capture the correlation among thee (short, medium, and long) debt maturity decisions. Findings – The authors find that a one standard deviation change in peer short (medium, long) maturity debt leads to a 50 percent (37 percent, 23 percent) change in firm corresponding maturity debt and that these mimetic behaviors are statistically significant within, but not between, firm size groups. The findings also reveal that firms that mimic the short and medium (long) debt maturity structure of their peers tend to increase (decrease) firm performance as measured by profitability, return-on-assets, and stock returns. Research limitations/implications – First, given the research design, the authors are constraint from pinpointing the exact date of the mimicking behaviors. This limitation prevents the authors from establishing the causality of the mimicking behavior and firm performance. Future research can extend the findings by solving this problem. Second, it should be interesting to address the question of whether mimicking behavior is good or bad for firm performance. The authors only compare the performance of Close Followers and Loose Followers; however, it would be more precise to compare the performance of mimicking firms with the performance of non-mimicking firms. Originality/value – First, the findings extend the debt maturity structure literature by providing empirical evidence that an important determinant of firm debt maturity is industry peer debt maturity. Since debt maturity directly influences firm risk and performance, it is important for debt and equity holders to know how firms choose their debt maturity so that they can estimate their investment risk precisely. Second, the paper provides new empirical evidence supporting the information acquisition and principal-agent theories in demonstrating that firm performance increases when managers herd over short and medium debt maturity decisions and decreases when managers herd over long debt maturity decisions.

Peer Financial Distress and Individual Leverage

Peers’ Income and Financial Distress: Evidence from Lottery Winners and Neighboring Bankruptcies

Targeted Debt Relief and the Origins of Financial Distress: Experimental Evidence from Distressed Credit Card Borrowers

Financial Distress and the Cross Section of Equity Returns

Peer-Group Detection of Banks and Resilience to Distress

Friends, Colleagues or Neighbors? Influential Peers in Microloan Defaults

Industry peer effect and the maturity structure of corporate debt

Study of the Nonlinear Effect of Debt Leverage on Household Financial Asset Allocation

Relationship Bank Behavior During Borrower Distress

Network Effects in Corporate Financial Policies

P2P finance and the effectiveness of monetary controls

Peer Effects on Capital Structure Decisions: Empirical Evidence from Selected Listed Companies of DSE

The Dynamics of Leverage and the Belief Distribution of Wealth

Effect of Investment, Free Cash Flow, Earnings Management, Interest Coverage Ratio, Liquidity, and Leverage on Financial Distress

Local Peer Effect and Bank Loan Financing an Empirical Analysis Based on China's A Share Market

Non-Cognitive Abilities and Financial Delinquency: The Role of Self-Efficacy in Avoiding Financial Distress

Peer effects in corporate financialization: The role of Fintech in financial decision making

Debt repayment problems: short-term and long-term implications for spending

Debt Collection Pressure and Mental Health: Evidence from a Cohort of U.S. Young Adults

Shale Shocked: Cash Windfalls and Household Debt Repayment

Consumption response to aggregate shocks and the role of leverage