Abstract:Due to their disease tolerance and cold hardy nature, interspecific hybrid grapes are widely grown in the Midwestern and Northeastern United States, with additional interest worldwide in the face of increased abiotic and biotic stresses from climate change. However, the aroma profile of these hybrids is unique and generally less popular in comparison with Vitis vinifera grapes. One of the challenges in any phenotyping project is first defining the traits of interest. As wine quality was our ultimate metric of interest, the aroma profile of commercial wines produced from the parents of a breeding population ( Vitis aestivalis derived 'Norton' x V. vinifera . 'Cabernet Sauvignon') was first assessed for traits of interest. We investigated 11 commercial wines each of Norton, a popular hybrid in Missouri and Cabernet Sauvignon (Cab) for their volatile profiles using the more inclusive metabolomics-based workflow. We then analyzed 21 Norton and 21 Cab grapes from different sites and vintages for the free and bound volatile compounds using HS-SPME-GCMS to validate the differences in wine. The GCMS data was processed using XCMS software to find features that were different between the two cultivars. The two cultivars were found to have differences in their volatile profiles, with 304 features different for wine volatiles, 418 features different for free volatiles, and 302 features different for bound volatiles at 0.05 significance level and with at least a 1.5-fold change between the two cultivars. Those features were used to identify several odor-active compounds in both grapes and wines, including β-damascenone, β-ionone, eugenol, 1,1,6-trimethyl-1,2-dihydronaphthalene (TDN), and methyl salicylate. Some of the identified compounds were higher in Norton than Cab; however, several features were higher in Cab. Using the identified aroma compounds as markers, we phenotyped an F1 population of Norton and Cab. The F1 population was found to be segregating for many aroma compounds with some genotypes demonstrating an even higher concentration of aroma volatiles than either of the parents. Ultimately, using commercially available samples paired with untargeted analysis proved to be an efficient way to determine phenotypes of interest for further analysis and may offer an easy way to choose potential parents with desired traits for breeding.

The genetic basis of grape and wine aroma

Comprehensive study of volatile compounds and transcriptome data providing genes for grape aroma

Origins of Grape and Wine Aroma. Part 1. Chemical Components and Viticultural Impacts

Progress on Genetic Regulation of the Major Aroma Substances in Grape

Impact of agronomic practices on grape aroma composition: a review

Aroma Glycosides in Grapes and Wine

The Actual and Potential Aroma of Winemaking Grapes

Wine Aroma Compounds in Grapes: A Critical Review

Aroma characterization based on aromatic series analysis in table grapes

The Genetic Basis of Tomato Aroma

Genetic architecture of berry aroma compounds in a QTL (quantitative trait loci) mapping population of interspecific hybrid grapes (Vitis labruscana × Vitis vinifera)

Genome-wide Analysis of the Putative AP2/ERF Family Genes in Vitis Vinifera

Management of Wine Aroma Compounds: Principal Basis and Future Perspectives

Research Progress of Aromatic Compounds and Influencing Factors in Grapes

Instrumental and Sensory Approaches for the Characterization of Compounds Responsible for Wine Aroma

Recent Advances in the Study of Grape and Wine Volatile Composition: Varietal, Fermentative, and Aging Aroma Compounds

The Metabolism Regulation of Important Aromatic Compounds Produced by Saccharomyces Cerevisiae in Wine

Determining wine aroma from compositional data

Progress in Study of Aromatic Compounds in Grape and Wine

Identification of key gene networks controlling monoterpene biosynthesis during grape ripening by integrating transcriptome and metabolite profiling

Generating Novel Aroma Phenotypes Using Commercial Wine Samples to Characterize an F1 Population