Abstract:MotivationProtein contacts contain key information for the understanding of protein structure and function and thus, contact prediction from sequence is an important problem. Recently exciting progress has been made on this problem, but the predicted contacts for proteins without many sequence homologs is still of low quality and not very useful for de novo structure prediction.MethodThis paper presents a new deep learning method that predicts contacts by integrating both evolutionary coupling (EC) and sequence conservation information through an ultra-deep neural network formed by two deep residual neural networks. The first residual network conducts a series of 1-dimensional convolutional transformation of sequential features; the second residual network conducts a series of 2-dimensional convolutional transformation of pairwise information including output of the first residual network, EC information and pairwise potential. By using very deep residual networks, we can accurately model contact occurrence patterns and complex sequence-structure relationship and thus, obtain higher-quality contact prediction regardless of how many sequence homologs are available for proteins in question.ResultsOur method greatly outperforms existing methods and leads to much more accurate contact-assisted folding. Tested on 105 CASP11 targets, 76 past CAMEO hard targets, and 398 membrane proteins, the average top L long-range prediction accuracy obtained by our method, one representative EC method CCMpred and the CASP11 winner MetaPSICOV is 0.47, 0.21 and 0.30, respectively; the average top L/10 long-range accuracy of our method, CCMpred and MetaPSICOV is 0.77, 0.47 and 0.59, respectively. Ab initio folding using our predicted contacts as restraints but without any force fields can yield correct folds (i.e., TMscore>0.6) for 203 of the 579 test proteins, while that using MetaPSICOV- and CCMpred-predicted contacts can do so for only 79 and 62 of them, respectively. Our contact-assisted models also have much better quality than template-based models especially for membrane proteins. The 3D models built from our contact prediction have TMscore>0.5 for 208 of the 398 membrane proteins, while those from homology modeling have TMscore>0.5 for only 10 of them. Further, even if trained mostly by soluble proteins, our deep learning method works very well on membrane proteins. In the recent blind CAMEO benchmark, our fully-automated web server implementing this method successfully folded 6 targets with a new fold and only 0.3L-2.3L effective sequence homologs, including one beta protein of 182 residues, one alpha+beta protein of 125 residues, one alpha protein of 140 residues, one a protein of 217 residues, one alpha/beta of 260 residues and one a protein of 462 residues. Our method also achieved the highest F1 score on free-modeling targets in the latest CASP (Critical Assessment of Structure Prediction), although it was not fully implemented back then.

Estimation of model accuracy in CASP13

Estimating protein complex model accuracy based on ultrafast shape recognition and deep learning in CASP15.

High‐accuracy protein structure prediction in CASP14

Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)—Round XIII

Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)—Round XIV

Accuracy Estimation of Individual Multimeric Protein Models Using Deep Energy-Based Models and Graph Neural Networks

A Survey of Deep Learning Methods for Estimating the Accuracy of Protein Quaternary Structure Models

Evaluation of model refinement in CASP13

Estimating Residue-Specific Accuracies of Protein Structure Models Using Molecular Dynamics Simulations

Protein structure accuracy estimation using geometry‐complete perceptron networks

Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)—Round XV

Deep‐learning contact‐map guided protein structure prediction in CASP13

Accurate De Novo Prediction Of Protein Contact Map By Ultra-Deep Learning Model

Protein Target Highlights in CASP15: Analysis of Models by Structure Providers.

QMEANclust: estimation of protein model quality by combining a composite scoring function with structural density information

The maximal and current accuracy of rigorous protein-ligand binding free energy calculations

Protein structure prediction using multiple deep neural networks in the 13th Critical Assessment of Protein Structure Prediction (CASP13)

Applying and improving AlphaFold at CASP14

zPoseScore model for accurate and robust protein–ligand docking pose scoring in CASP15

Integrating deep learning, threading alignments, and a multi‐MSA strategy for high‐quality protein monomer and complex structure prediction in CASP15

Physical-aware model accuracy estimation for protein complex using deep learning method