Revisiting the regulation of the capsular polysaccharide biosynthesis gene cluster in Staphylococcus aureus

Daniela Keinhörster,Andrea Salzer,Alejandra Duque‐Jaramillo,Shilpa E. George,Gabriella Marincola,Jean C. Lee,Christopher Weidenmaier,Christiane Wolz
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.14347
2019-07-25
Molecular Microbiology
Abstract:<p>Capsular polysaccharide (CP) biosynthesis in <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> is tightly controlled resulting in a heterogeneous phenotype within a population and CP being mainly detectable in non‐growing cells. Expression of the corresponding biosynthesis gene cluster is driven by one promoter element (P<sub><i>cap</i></sub>). Here, we demonstrate that P<sub><i>cap</i></sub> contains a main SigB‐dependent promoter. The SigB consensus motif overlaps with a previously described inverted repeat that is crucial for <i>cap</i> expression. The essentiality of the inverted repeat is derived from this region acting as a SigB binding site rather than as an operator site for the proposed <i>cap</i> activators RbsR and MsaB. Furthermore, P<sub><i>cap</i></sub> contains an extensive upstream region harboring a weak SigA‐dependent promoter and binding sites for <i>cap</i> repressors such as SaeR, CodY and Rot. Heterogeneous CP synthesis is determined by SigB activity and repressor binding to the upstream region. SigB dependency and regulation by the upstream repressors are also sufficient to explain the temporal gene expression pattern at the transcriptional level. However, CP synthesis remains growth phase‐dependent even when transcription is rendered constitutive, suggesting additional post‐transcriptional regulatory circuits. Thus, the interference of multiple repressors with SigB‐dependent promoter activity as well as post‐transcriptional mechanisms ensure the appropriate regulation of CP synthesis.</p><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.</p>
microbiology,biochemistry & molecular biology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?