Editorial: International day of happiness: happiness and wellbeing in the age of climate catastrophe
Andrew H. Kemp,Zoe Fisher,Panu Pihkala
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1497347
IF: 3.8
2024-10-08
Frontiers in Psychology
Abstract:The quest for happiness and wellbeing amid global environmental crises presents complex challenges, but also opportunities. Initiated on the International Day of Happiness in 2022, our research topic invited reflection on various aspects related to this quest amid the climate catastrophe. Related themes are discussed in the 'Climate Change and Happiness' podcast (see: https://climatechangeandhappiness.com/), one of the inspirations for this research topic.What will happen to happiness amidst the intensifying climate crisis? The future looks daunting: threats to happiness include forced climate displacement of entire populations, potentially exceeding 140 million people by 2050 (e.g., Xu et al., 2020), predictions of the first mass biodiversity extinction event caused entirely by humans (e.g., Cowie et al. 2022), the intensification of climate-related conflicts and wars (e.g. Mach et al., 2019;Li et al., 2021) and the collapse of agricultural systems leading to existential risks for humanity (e.g., Richards et al., 2021). These predictions are already materialising through migration crises, species loss, international tensions and food shortages. The climate crisis is here, and some argue that it should already be called a climate catastrophe (e.g. Boyd 2023).The situation evokes many kinds of 'climate-related emotion', including aspects of anger, sadness, fear and even positive feelings including gratitude (for example, about those who participate in climate action), empowerment and hope (Fig 1). Such emotions can impact on our capacity to function and are associated with pro-environmental behaviours and wellbeing in complex ways (Pihkala, 2022;Brosch & Sauter, 2023).Figure 1: The Climate Emotions Wheel by Panu Pikhala, licensed under CC BY-NC-SA. Reprinted from https://www.climatementalhealth.net/wheel Climate-related emotions can adversely impact on wellbeing including anxiety, fear, worry (Kurth & Pihkala, 2022), grief, sadness (Pihkala, 2024), and guilt or shame. Yet, these emotions also have the potential to drive meaningful action at multiple levels of scale. For instance, emotionally evocative letters of apology to future generations (see https://youtu.be/yJvczRkQHK0?si=HkN7humvYND3vZt6), reflect an expression of increasing public shame in climate change professionals -as well as frustration and catharsis -that may ultimately foster deeper engagement within individuals, communities and institutions in addressing the complex barriers that have delayed climate action.Climate change has been described as a 'super-wicked problem' (Cross & Congreve, 2021), a threat multiplier that will inevitably constrain our capacity for wellbeing (Lawrance et al., 2022). Wellbeing is an equally complex construct (Wilkie et al., 2022), encompassing positive emotions (Fredrickson, 2004), sense of meaning (Wong, 2016), inner development (Woiwode et al., 2021), social identity (Jetten et al., 2017), social cohesion (Delhey & Dragolov, 2016), nature connection (Martin et al., 2020), and pro-environmental behaviours (Capstick et al., 2022). This work has prompted researchers to reflect deeply on how research on wellbeingbroadly defined -can support societies to address impending climate-related disasters. It has facilitated the integration of historically distinct sub-disciplines, including positive psychology, acceptance and commitment therapy, and climate psychology (Kemp & Edwards, 2022). Fig 2 is illustrative of some considerations relating to the interconnections between climate change, survival and wellbeing. This is not only a meaningful intellectual enterprise, but one with significant implications for societal transformation (Kemp & Fisher, 2022). Below, we briefly comment on the seven published scholarly articles in our topic, which provide insights into addressing climate change through the lens of wellbeing.We begin with the contribution from Isham, Morgan, and Kemp who advocate for a wellbeing-focused approach to climate psychology [https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1205991], underpinned by a social ecological understanding of distress and wellbeing that places the individual within the context of their groups and systems. The Power Threat Meaning Framework (PTMF) (Johnstone & Boyle, 2018) provides a non-pathological framing of distress and highlights how individuals and their communities can harness their strengths and resources for effective responses to threats, creating opportunities for wellbeing despite considerable distress. Complementing this approach is the holistic model of wellbeing, the GENIAL framework (Kemp & Fisher, 2022) which emphasises a key role for connections to self, others, and nature (see also Bristow, Bell & Wamsler, 2022, Woiwode et al., 2021), reflecting the complexity of wellbeing across individual, collective, and planetary levels. Initiatives such as mindfulness training, prosocial practices, and -Abstract Truncated-
psychology, multidisciplinary