Dynamics of fungal communities during Gastrodia elata growth

Lin Chen,Yu-Chuan Wang,Li-Yuan Qin,Hai-Yan He,Xian-Lun Yu,Ming-Zhi Yang,Han-Bo Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-019-1501-z
IF: 4.465
2019-07-10
BMC Microbiology
Abstract:<h3 class="Heading">Background</h3><p class="Para"><em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">Gastrodia elata</em> is a widely distributed achlorophyllous orchid and is highly valued as both medicine and food. <em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">Gastrodia elata</em> produces dust-like seeds and relies on mycorrhizal fungi for its germination and growth. In its life cycle, <em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">G. elata</em> is considered to switch from a specific single-fungus relationship (<em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">Mycena</em>) to another single-fungus relationship (<em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">Armillaria</em>). However, no studies have investigated the changes in the plant-fungus relationship during the growth of <em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">G. elata</em> in the wild. In this study, high-throughput sequencing was used to characterize the fungal community of tubers in different growth phases as well as the soils surrounding <em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">G. elata</em>.</p><h3 class="Heading">Results</h3><p class="Para">The predominant fungi were Basidiomycota (60.44%) and Ascomycota (26.40%), which exhibited changes in abundance and diversity with the growth phases of <em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">G. elata</em>. Diverse basidiomycetes in protocorms (phase P) were <em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">Hyphodontia</em>, <em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">Sistotrema</em>, <em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">Tricholoma</em>, <em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">Mingxiaea</em>, <em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">Russula</em>, and <em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">Mycena</em>, but the community changed from a large proportion of <em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">Resinicium bicolor</em> (40%) in rice-like tubers (phase M) to an unidentified Agaricales operational taxonomic unit 1(OTU1,98.45%) in propagation vegetation tubers (phase B). The soil fungi primarily included <em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">Simocybe</em>, <em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">Psathyrella</em>, <em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">Conocybe</em>, and <em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">Subulicystidium</em>. Three <em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">Mycena</em> OTUs obtained in this study were differentially distributed among the growth phases of <em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">G. elata</em>, accounting for less than 1.0% of the total reads, and were phylogenetically close to <em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">Mycena epipterygia</em> and <em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">M. alexandri</em>.</p><h3 class="Heading">Conclusions</h3><p class="Para">Our data indicated that <em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">G. elata</em> interacts with a broad range of fungi beyond the <em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">Mycena</em> genus. These fungi changed with the growth phases of <em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">G. elata</em>. In addition, these data suggested that the development of the fungal community during the growth of <em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">G. elata</em> was more complex than previously assumed and that at least two different fungi could be involved in development before the arrival of <em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">Armillaria</em>.</p>
microbiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?