The Systemic Risk Implications of Using Credit Ratings Versus Quantitative Measures to Limit Bond Portfolio Risk

Gunter Löffler
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10693-019-00321-9
2019-07-10
Journal of Financial Services Research
Abstract:Despite intense criticism, agency credit ratings are still widely used in regulation and risk management. One possible alternative is to replace them with quantitative default risk measures. For US data, I find that systemically relevant losses from corporate defaults are mostly smaller if risk-taking in portfolios is limited with the help of default probability estimates from the Credit Research Initiative rather than through Moody's ratings. The results continue to hold when investors follow a regulatory arbitrage strategy that tilts portfolios toward issuers with high systematic risk. I further show that combining information from both measures can lead to a systemic risk profile that is more favorable than can be achieved by using only one.
business, finance
What problem does this paper attempt to address?