Abstract:In recent years, reinforcement learning has seen interest because of deep Q-Learning, where the model is a convolutional neural network. Deep Q-Learning has shown promising results in games such as Atari and AlphaGo. Instead of learning the entire Q-table, it learns an estimate of the Q function that determines a state's policy action. We use Q-Learning and deep Q-learning, to learn control policies of four constraint satisfaction games (15-Puzzle, Minesweeper, 2048, and Sudoku). 15-Puzzle is a sliding permutation puzzle and provides a challenge in addressing its large state space. Minesweeper and Sudoku involve partially observable states and guessing. 2048 is also a sliding puzzle but allows for easier state representation (compared to 15-Puzzle) and uses interesting reward shaping to solve the game. These games offer unique insights into the potential and limits of reinforcement learning. The Q agent is trained with no rules of the game, with only the reward corresponding to each state's action. Our unique contribution is in choosing the reward structure, state representation, and formulation of the deep neural network. For low shuffle, 15-Puzzle, achieves a 100% win rate, the medium and high shuffle achieve about 43% and 22% win rates respectively. On a standard 16x16 Minesweeper board, both low and high-density boards achieve close to 45% win rate, whereas medium density boards have a low win rate of 15%. For 2048, the 1024 win rate was achieved with significant ease (100%) with high win rates for 2048, 4096, 8192 and 16384 as 40%, 0.05%, 0.01% and 0.004% , respectively. The easy Sudoku games had a win rate of 7%, while medium and hard games had 2.1% and 1.2% win rates, respectively. This paper explores the environment complexity and behavior of a subset of constraint games using reward structures which can get us closer to understanding how humans learn.

Solving the Rubik’s cube with deep reinforcement learning and search

Solving Rubik’s cube via quantum mechanics and deep reinforcement learning

Solving Rubik's Cube Without Tricky Sampling

Solving Rubik's Cube with a Robot Hand

On Solving the Rubik's Cube with Domain-Independent Planners Using Standard Representations

Learning to Solve a Rubik's Cube with a Dexterous Hand

Learning to Solve a Rubik’s Cube with a Dexterous Hand

Alphazzle: Jigsaw Puzzle Solver with Deep Monte-Carlo Tree Search

Casting Rubik’s Group into a Unitary Representation for Reinforcement Learning

Towards Learning Rubik's Cube with N-tuple-based Reinforcement Learning

A Novel Automated Curriculum Strategy to Solve Hard Sokoban Planning Instances

Reinforcement Learning For Constraint Satisfaction Game Agents (15-Puzzle, Minesweeper, 2048, and Sudoku)

PUZZLES: A Benchmark for Neural Algorithmic Reasoning

Towards Learning Foundation Models for Heuristic Functions to Solve Pathfinding Problems

Beyond Tabula-Rasa: a Modular Reinforcement Learning Approach for Physically Embedded 3D Sokoban

Solving Zebra Puzzles Using Constraint-Guided Multi-Agent Systems

MathDQN: Solving Arithmetic Word Problems Via Deep Reinforcement Learning.

A solver of single-agent stochastic puzzle: A case study with Minesweeper

Playing Tetris with Reinforcement Learning

AlphaMapleSAT: An MCTS-based Cube-and-Conquer SAT Solver for Hard Combinatorial Problems

Deep reinforcement learning in playing Tetris with robotic arm experiment