Abstract:Government redistribution is increasingly important in today's world. The effect of income distribution on industrialization and growth, and the causes of income redistribution have been studied in the contemporary literature. The normative significance of income redistribution, however, which is the focus of this paper, has been rarely studied. In this paper we analyze how income redistribution makes a potential Pareto improvement. For a given amount of total income, redistributing more income to consumers who spend relatively more on more elastically supplied goods increases the aggregate expenditure on more elastically supplied goods, while reducing the aggregate expenditure on less elastically supplied goods at the same amount. This paper shows that such reallocation of expenditures results in an increase in the equilibrium output of more elastically supplied goods, more than compensating for the decrease in equilibrium output of less elastically supplied goods. The aggregate Marshallian consumer surplus is raised and the potential Pareto improvement is then achieved. A perfectly competitive market is Pareto optimal for any income distribution at the individual level: all consumers maximize utilities for given income distribution and firms maximize profits. However, the Pareto optimal at the individual level does not ensure that the potential Pareto optimal at aggregate level is realized due to income distribution non-optimality. It is usually believed that income redistribution is aimed to improve social justice. We show in this paper that income redistribution can significantly improve efficiency at aggregate level. Using an example, we show that redistribution can improve social welfare more than 25%. If rich people spend relatively more on inelastically supplied goods than poor people do, the improvements of social justice and aggregate efficiency could move in the same direction. We give a testable condition for efficiency improving redistribution in the general case: if the consumer's sum of expenditure shares, weighted by inverse of 1 plus elasticities of supplies is less than the others' sum, redistributing more income to the consumer will make the potential Pareto improvement.

The Kaldor–Hicks Potential Compensation Principle and the Constant Marginal Utility of Income

The Economy's Potential: Duality and Equilibrium

Choice overload, coordination and inequality: three hurdles to the effectiveness of the compensation mechanism?

Competitive Market Efficiency and Income Distribution Non-Optimality: A Theorem on Income Redistribution

The marginal utility of income and homogeneous demand systems

A note on redistributive fairness and economic reform

Efficient Social Welfare Function and Optimal Income Distribution

Optimal Indirect Taxes and Subsidies under Imperfect Competition

Optimal Indirect Taxation under Imperfect Competition

Quantifying the Gap between Equilibrium and Optimum Under Monopolistic Competition

Comparative statics with adjustment costs and the le Chatelier principle

Optimal In-Kind Redistribution

Nonparametric estimation of structural labor supply and exact welfare change under nonconvex piecewise-linear budget sets

The Value of Government and the Efficiency of Noncooperative Equilibrium

Asymptotic efficiency of the proportional compensation scheme for a large number of producers

A Theory of Fairness in Labour Markets

Optimal incentive contracts under relative income concerns

Optimal Taxation with Misperception on Prices

Nonlinear Pricing with Misspecified and Arbitrary Perception of the Marginal Price

Complementarity of willingness to pay and cost heterogeneity under vertical product differentiation: A welfare analysis