Abstract:Purpose Virtual assistants are increasingly used for persuasive purposes, employing the different modalities of voice and text (or a combination of the two). In this study, the authors compare the persuasiveness of voice-and text-based virtual assistants. The authors argue for perceived human-likeness and cognitive load as underlying mechanisms that can explain why voice- and text-based assistants differ in their persuasive potential by suppressing the activation of consumers' persuasion knowledge. Design/methodology/approach A pre-registered online-experiment (n = 450) implemented a text-based and two voice-based (with and without interaction history displayed in text) virtual assistants. Findings Findings show that, contrary to expectations, a text-based assistant is perceived as more human-like compared to a voice-based assistant (regardless of whether the interaction history is displayed), which in turn positively influences brand attitudes and purchase intention. The authors also find that voice as a communication modality can increase persuasion knowledge by being cognitively more demanding in comparison to text. Practical implications Simply using voice as a presumably human cue might not suffice to give virtual assistants a human-like appeal. For the development of virtual assistants, it might be beneficial to actively engage consumers to increase awareness of persuasion. Originality/value The current study adds to the emergent research stream considering virtual assistants in explicitly exploring modality differences between voice and text (and a combination of the two) and provides insights into the effects of persuasion coming from virtual assistants.

The Effects of Modality, Device, and Task Differences on Perceived Human Likeness of Voice-Activated Virtual Assistants

Uncovering Post-Adoption Usage of AI-based Voice Assistants: a Technology Affordance Lens Using a Mixed-Methods Approach

Designing Emotional Expressions of Conversational States for Voice Assistants: Modality and Engagement.

Is voice really persuasive? The influence of modality in virtual assistant interactions and two alternative explanations

Voice Assistant vs. Chatbot – Examining the Fit Between Conversational Agents’ Interaction Modalities and Information Search Tasks

The Impact of Perceived Tone, Age, and Gender on Voice Assistant Persuasiveness in the Context of Product Recommendations

Unraveling the Effects of Voice Assistant Interactions on Digital Engagement: the Moderating Role of Adult Playfulness

Building Trust Through Voice: How Vocal Tone Impacts User Perception of Attractiveness of Voice Assistants

Designing Emotional Expressions of Conversational States for Voice Assistants: Modality and Engagement

Comparing the User Preferences Towards Emotional Voice Interaction Applied on Different Devices: An Empirical Study

Merging and synchronizing corporate and personal voice agents: Comparison of voice agents acting as a secretary and a housekeeper

How to Improve Voice Assistant Evaluations: Understanding the Role of Attachment with a Socio-Technical Systems Perspective

Abstract or concrete? The effects of language style and service context on continuous usage intention for AI voice assistants

Human and LLM-Based Voice Assistant Interaction: An Analytical Framework for User Verbal and Nonverbal Behaviors

Is Natural Necessary? Human Voice versus Synthetic Voice for Intelligent Virtual Agents

Adopting Voice Assistants in Online Shopping: Examining the Role of Social Presence, Performance Risk, and Machine Heuristic

How Social Cues in Virtual Assistants Influence Concerns and Persuasion: The Role of Voice and a Human Name

How Voice and Helpfulness Shape Perceptions in Human-Agent Teams

Effects of voice assistant recommendations on consumer behavior

Voice Unbound: The Impact of Localization and Experience on Continuous Personal Voice Assistant Usage and Its Drivers

Exploring the Appearance and Voice Mismatch of Virtual Characters