False Hopes and Blind Beliefs: How Political Connections Affect China's Corporate Bond Market

Denis Schweizer,Thomas John Walker,Aoran Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3419836
2019-01-01
SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract:This paper explores whether and how political connections affect the market for corporate bonds issued by privately owned enterprises (POEs) in China. We test two competing theories – the zero-default myth and the borrower channel theory – that predict how political connections affect the likelihood of bond issuance, refinancing costs, the market reaction to a bond issue announcement, and firms’ post-issue performance. Using a sample of Chinese POEs from 2007 to 2016, we show that – in line with the zero-default myth theory – politically connected POEs are more likely to issue corporate bonds as a debt financing instrument than their non-connected counterparts. They also achieve lower coupon rates (i.e., lower refinancing costs), despite exhibiting lower overall performance after bond issuance. We find that investors react positively to corporate bond-issuing announcements if the issuing firm is politically connected. At the same time, our research indicates that politically connected bond-issuing POEs in China have weaker corporate governance and a surprisingly higher default probability than non-connected issuers.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?