Rural water for thirsty cities: a systematic review of water reallocation from rural to urban regions
Dustin Garrick,Lucia De Stefano,Winston Yu,Isabel Jorgensen,Erin O’Donnell,Laura Turley,Ismael Aguilar-Barajas,Xiaoping Dai,Renata de Souza Leão,Bharat Punjabi,Barbara Schreiner,Jesper Svensson,Charles Wight
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab0db7
IF: 6.7
2019-04-10
Environmental Research Letters
Abstract:<span><i>Background:</i> Competition for freshwater between cities and agriculture is projected to grow due to rapid urbanization, particularly in the Global South. Water reallocation from rural to urban regions has become a common strategy to meet freshwater needs in growing cities. Conceptual issues and associated measurement problems have impeded efforts to compare and learn from global experiences. This review examines the status and trends of water reallocation from rural to urban regions based on academic literature and policy documents. <i>Methods:</i> We conduct a systematic literature review to establish the global reallocation database (GRaD). This process yielded 97 published studies (academic and policy) on rural-to-urban reallocation. We introduce the concept of reallocation 'dyads' as the unit of analysis to describe the pair of a <i>recipient</i> (urban) and <i>donor</i> (rural) region. A coding framework was developed iteratively to classify the drivers, processes and outcomes of water reallocation from a political economy perspective. <i>Results:</i> The systematic review identified 69 urban agglomerations receiving water through 103 reallocation projects (dyads). Together these reallocation dyads involve approximately 16 billion m<sup>3</sup> of water per year moving almost 13 000 kilometres to urban recipient regions with an estimated 2015 population of 383 million. Documented water reallocation dyads are concentrated in North America and Asia with the latter constituting the majority of dyads implemented since 2000. <i>Synthesis:</i> The analysis illustrates how supply and demand interact to drive water reallocation projects, which can take many forms, although collective negotiation and administrative decisions are most prevalent. Yet it also reveals potential biases and gaps in coverage for parts of the Global South (particularly in South America and Africa), where reallocation (a) can involve informal processes that are difficult to track and (b) receives limited coverage by the English-language literature covered by the review. Data regarding the impacts on the donor region and compensation are also limited, constraining evidence to assess whether a water reallocation project is truly effective, equitable and sustainable. We identify frameworks and metrics for assessing reallocation projects and navigating the associated trade-offs by drawing on the concept of benefit sharing.Urban water demand is projected to increase by 50–80% by 2050, often in regions also experiencing irrigation development (Florke <em>et al</em> <a href="#erlab0db7bib12">2018</a>, World Bank <a href="#erlab0db7bib41">2018</a>). These trends are spurring competition between cities and agriculture for water (Bhatia <em>et al</em> <a href="#erlab0db7bib5">1995</a>, Molle and Berkoff <a href="#erlab0db7bib25">2009</a>, Florke <em>et al</em> <a href="#erlab0db7bib12">2018</a>). The conflict between the city of Los Angeles and the Owens Valley in the early 20th century illustrates that this is not a new challenge (Libecap <a href="#erlab0db7bib17">2009</a>), but a four-fold increase in urban populations since 1960 has created new flashpoints for rural-urban water conflicts globally (Molden <a href="#erlab0db7bib23">2007</a>, Celio <em>et al</em> <a href="#erlab0db7bib7">2010</a>, Scott and Pablos <a href="#erlab0db7bib36">2011</a>, Punjabi and Johnson <a href="#erlab0db7bib29">2018</a>). The water supply of approximately one-third of the world's surface-water dependent cities is already vulnerable due to competition with agricultural users, and this figure is expected to increase through 2040 as urban and agricultural demands continue to grow (Padowski and Gorelick <a href="#erlab0db7bib28">2014</a>). Despite these trends, research on conflict and cooperation over water between urban and rural regions has been limited. Although research has intensified over the past 15 years, it is hindered by conceptual issues and associated measurement problems.Water reallocation from rural to urban regions is one prominent response to meet growing demands for freshwater in cities, and address the impacts of climate change and water quality problems. Reallocation exists alongside the development of new water supplies and demand management, and is often pursued in conjunction with them (Molle <a href="#erlab0db7bib24">2003</a>). Cities often view adjacent agricultural and rural regions as prime sources of urban water supply after local and lower-cost sources have been exhausted (Richter <em>et al</em> <a href="#erlab0db7bib31">2013</a>). The relatively large volumes, the often low water-use efficiency and low marginal economic productivity of water in agriculture have prompted growing interest in water resource reallocation from rural to urban regions, despite important differences in the nature of water use and water stress in urban areas. In cities, only a small proportion of w <p>-Abstract Truncated-</p>
environmental sciences,meteorology & atmospheric sciences