Abstract:Despite persistent efforts to understand the dynamics of creativity of scientists over careers in terms of productivity, impact, and prize, little is known about the dynamics of scientists' disruptive efforts that affect individual academic careers and drive scientific advance. Drawing on millions of data over six decades and across nineteen disciplines, associating the publication records of individual scientists with the disruption index, we systematically quantify the temporal pattern of disruptive ideas over individual scientific careers, providing a detailed understanding of the macro phenomenon of scientific stagnation from the individual perspective. We start by checking the relationship between disruption-based and citation-based publication profiles. Next, we observe the finite inequality in the disruptive productivity of scientists, diminishing gradually as the level of disruption increases. We then identify the initial burst phenomenon in disruption dynamics. It is further revealed that while early engagement in high disruption frictions away initial productivity, compared to initial advantage in productivity or impact, initial high disruption ensures more subsequent academic viability evidenced by a longer career span and relatively final higher productivity, but does not necessarily guarantee academic success throughout careers. Further analysis shows that increasing disruptive work is uncorrelated to overall productivity but negatively correlated with the overall impact. However, increasing disruptive work in the early career is associated with higher overall productivity, yet lower overall productivity in the later career. Our research underscores the urgent need for a policy shift that encourages a balance between the pursuit of disruptive efforts and the achievement of impactful outcomes.

Does Science Advance One Funeral at a Time?

Aging Scientists and Slowed Advance

The Death of Renaissance Scientist

Mid-career pitfall of consecutive success in science

Initial Burst of Disruptive Efforts Ensuring Scientific Career Viability

Quantifying the rise and fall of scientific fields.

Science beyond boundary: are premature discoveries things of the past?

Standing on the shoulders of giants: the effect of outstanding scientists on young collaborators’ careers

The Risks of Scientific Gerontocracy

The death effect in literary evaluation: reverence for the dead?

The Time Dimension of Science: Connecting the Past to the Future

The Chaperone Effect in Scientific Publishing

Characterizing Scientists Leaving Science Before Their Time: Evidence from Mathematics

Loss of sustainability in scientific work

Scientific elite revisited: patterns of productivity, collaboration, authorship and impact

Quantifying the impact of weak, strong, and super ties in scientific careers

Early-career factors largely determine the future impact of prominent researchers: evidence across eight scientific fields

Slowed canonical progress in large fields of science

The More Who Die, the Less We Care: Evidence from Natural Language Analysis of Online News Articles and Social Media Posts

Team careers in science: formation, composition and success of persistent collaborations

Long live the scientists: Tracking the scientific fame of great minds in physics