Natural Questions: A Benchmark for Question Answering Research

Tom Kwiatkowski,Jennimaria Palomaki,Olivia Redfield,Michael Collins,Ankur Parikh,Chris Alberti,Danielle Epstein,Illia Polosukhin,Jacob Devlin,Kenton Lee,Kristina Toutanova,Llion Jones,Matthew Kelcey,Ming-Wei Chang,Andrew M. Dai,Jakob Uszkoreit,Quoc Le,Slav Petrov
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00276
IF: 10.9
2019-11-01
Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
Abstract:We present the Natural Questions corpus, a question answering data set. Questions consist of real anonymized, aggregated queries issued to the Google search engine. An annotator is presented with a question along with a Wikipedia page from the top 5 search results, and annotates a long answer (typically a paragraph) and a short answer (one or more entities) if present on the page, or marks null if no long/short answer is present. The public release consists of 307,373 training examples with single annotations; 7,830 examples with 5-way annotations for development data; and a further 7,842 examples with 5-way annotated sequestered as test data. We present experiments validating quality of the data. We also describe analysis of 25-way annotations on 302 examples, giving insights into human variability on the annotation task. We introduce robust metrics for the purposes of evaluating question answering systems; demonstrate high human upper bounds on these metrics; and establish baseline results using competitive methods drawn from related literature.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?