Evidence in Surgery—Levels and Significance

Sandeep Kumar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-019-01939-8
2019-08-01
Indian Journal of Surgery
Abstract:The past two decades of modern medical practice has witnessed increasing use of the term evidence-based medicine (EBM). This was inadvertently defined by David Sackett et al. in 1996 as 'A systematic approach to clinical problem solving by the integration of best research evidence with clinical expertise and patient values' [<span class="CitationRef"><a href="#CR1">1</a></span>]. Yet another definition emerged from Dr. Gordon Guyatt's statement: 'The conscientious, explicit and judicious use of current best evidence in making decisions about the care of the individual patient' [<span class="CitationRef"><a href="#CR2">2</a></span>]. Both these definitions have the same implications. It means consolidated individual clinical experience with the best available external clinical evidence from systematic research in a given situation. Therefore, the three important components of EBM are best research evidence, clinical expertise and patients' values and preferences. This fundamental principle of evidence-based practice is imperative for today's surgeon. Application of 'best evidence' if used judiciously results in improved standards of surgical care. Surgical training and teaching should also be evidence based, for example, high-fidelity simulation laboratories, for laparoscopic, robotic and micro-surgical training has become important. The question arises what is research? A good answer is 'focussed systematic enquiry generating new knowledge to improve health, treatment outcomes and patient satisfaction'.
surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?