Abstract:Our memories of other people shape how we interact with them. Yet, even when we forget exactly what others said or did, we often remember impressions that capture a general gist of their behavior-whether they were forthright, friendly, or funny. Drawing on fuzzy trace theory, we propose two modes of social impression formation: impressions formed based on ordinal gist ("more competent," "less competent") or categorical gist ("competent," "incompetent"). In turn, we propose that people gravitate toward the simplest representation available and that different modes of memory have distinct consequences for social decisions. Specifically, ordinal impressions lead people to make decisions based on an individual's standing relative to others, whereas categorical impressions lead people to make decisions based on discrete classifications that interpret behavior. In four experiments, participants learned about two groups of individuals who differed in their competence (Studies 1a, 2, and 3) or generosity (Study 1b). When participants encoded impressions as ordinal rankings, they preferred to hire or help a relatively good target from a low-performing group over a relatively bad target from a high-performing group, even though both targets behaved identically and accuracy was incentivized. However, when participants could use categorical boundaries to interpret behavior, this preference was eliminated. In a final experiment, changing the category participants used to encode others' generosity changed their impressions, even when accounting for memory for verbatim details. This work links social impressions to theories of mental representation in memory and judgment, highlighting how distinct representations support divergent patterns of social decision-making. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Information as a Moderator of Accuracy in Personality Judgment

The Automatic Processing of Social Information in Working Memory.

Laypeople's beliefs about the effects of common estimator variables on memory

Testing perceivers’ accuracy and accuracy awareness when forming personality impressions from faces

Do accurate personality impressions benefit early relationship development? The bidirectional associations between accuracy and liking.

Social Curiosity and Interpersonal Perception: A Judge × Trait Interaction

Individual Differences in Interpersonal Accuracy: A Multi-Level Meta-Analysis to Assess Whether Judging Other People is One Skill or Many

Figuring Out How Others See Us

Affordances in social judgment: Experimental proof of why it is a mistake to ignore how others behave towards a target and look solely at how the target behaves

The illusion of information adequacy

Digital data and personality: A systematic review and meta-analysis of human perception and computer prediction.

Forming Evaluations of Moral Character: How Are Multiple Pieces of Information Prioritized and Integrated?

On Personality Measures and Their Data: A Classification of Measurement Approaches and Their Recommended Uses

Two modes of social impressions and their effects on choice.

Interpersonal deception: V. Accuracy in deception detection

Preferences for advisor agreement and accuracy

Acquaintance ratings of honesty-humility and their relationship with extra-role behaviors

A little garbage in, lots of garbage out: Assessing the impact of careless responding in personality survey data

Liking Predicts Judgments of Authenticity in Real-Time Interactions More Robustly Than Personality States or Affect

What defines Traits, Reputations, and Identity? Personality item content in multi-rater judgments

The Catch-22 of Forgetfulness: Responsibility for Mental Mistakes