Abstract:Many studies of the campaign and the battle of Marathon have suffered from conflicts between scholars in the field of hypothesis. The article by J. Kromayer illustrates this admirably. He concerned himself mainly with the rival hypotheses of Curtius and Delbrück, the former maintaining that the Persians embarked most of their force and all the cavalry just before the battle, and the latter that the Persians did not do so at all but delivered a full-scale but unsuccessful attack up the Vraná valley, which resulted in a counter-attack by the Greeks. Neither hypothesis rests upon the ancient evidence. Yet Curtius has been followed by Munro, Grundy and others, and recently by Gomme, Pritchett and Burn; and Delbrück has been followed by Meyer, De Sanctis and others. Other hypotheses are made about the duration of the engagement. They vary from Munro's matter of ‘minutes’ to Delbrück's three phases of hard-fought action, although they are both in conflict with the evidence of Herodotus. Again, hypotheses have been advanced in an attempt to dispense with the topographical evidence, for instance of the Mound at Marathon, e.g. the hypothesis that it existed before the battle. In a paper delivered in 1920 and published in this Journal in 1964, Whatley expressed his doubts about the value of such hypotheses; but he himself became involved in drawing analogies between the massive, complicated and many-fronted First World War and the one-day battle of Marathon—analogies which are quite misleading. In this paper I propose to be as economical as possible in making hypotheses and to keep to the ancient evidence first. This leads to a different order of exposition; for most scholars have begun with the campaign, formed their theory of the aims of the Persians and of the Greeks, and tried to make the battle conform with the theory, but I shall begin with the battle itself, for which we have much evidence, and treat the campaign afterwards.

The aetiology of death for marathon runner Phidippides?

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy associated with sudden death during marathon racing.

Mortality Among Marathon Runners in the United States, 2000-2009

Mortality during marathons: a narrative review of the literature

Sudden death and cardiac arrest in marathon runners: incidence rates and causes

Epidemiology and Aetiology of Marathon Running Injuries

Sudden death while running in conditioned runners aged 40 years or over

[Myocarditis in Olympic marathon runner]

Extensive Coronary Artery Disease in a Long-Distance Athlete: A Case Report

An unusual case of marathon-related exercise associated collapse: Case report and some considerations for medical care at endurance mass participation events

Cardiac Risks Associated With Marathon Running

Relative Risk of Sudden Cardiac Death During Marathon Running

Prevalence and Spectrum of Electrocardiogram Abnormalities in Amateur Marathon Runners

Can Noncardiac Syncope Occur during Exercise?

Historical Perspective and Medical Maladies of Alexander the Great

A case of unprovoked venous thromboembolism in a marathon athlete presenting atypical sequelae: What are the chances?

Death and Near Death from Cardiac Arrest during the Boston Marathon

[An amateur marathon runner after sudden cardiac arrest. Whether and when can he return to sport competition?]

[Medical emergencies during running events]

A case series of eight amateur athletes: exercise-induced pre-/syncope during the Zurich Marathon 2023

The Campaign and the Battle of Marathon