Remembering the Revolution: Neo-Marxist Interpretations of the German Revolution 1918/1919—A Challenge for Cold War Historiography

Ralf Hoffrogge
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03804-5_5
2019-01-01
Abstract:How to remember a revolution? This chapter deals with the difficult memory of the German Revolution of 1918/1919. Its memory polarized during the Weimar Republic and the years of the Cold War, and the interpretation of events was crucial for the identity of a New Marxist Left that reappeared in West Germany. Among the members of this New Left, it was seen as a failed revolution or a “revolution betrayed.” This leitmotif of an unfulfilled promise was set against a dominating narrative shaped by liberal and social democratic authors. They would frame the 1918 Revolution as a success story: It established the first German democracy. The Weimar Constitution of 1919 was seen as a compromise between the working and middle classes preventing a “Soviet dictatorship.” This interpretation identified both the movement of Workers’ Councils and the Rosa Luxemburg’s Spartacus League with post-1949 State Socialism. Ironically, this identification was paralleled in East German historiography: The GDR’s ruling Socialist Unity Party (SED) claimed to have fulfilled the rightful demands of 1918, especially those of the Spartacus League and the Workers’ Councils. Due to this framework of the Cold war, pirate copies of pre-war historical publications on the Revolution became especially important for the New Left in West Germany. Unlike France and Italy or even Great Britain, where the interpretation of historical or theoretical concepts of Marxism was undertaken within or linked to the organizational framework of a Communist Party, German young radicals were “left alone” with the texts.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?