Agro-ecological Regions for Better Crop Planning and Ecosystem Services

D. K. Pal

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22711-1_2

2019-01-01

Abstract:Food and nutritional security on sustainable basis will remain the major challenge for Indian agriculture like in many tropical countries of the world in the twenty-first century. Through irrigation, an increased crop production may be possible, but the speed of the expansion of irrigation potential in 140 m ha of Indian arable land is not taking place at the expected speed at present. On the other hand, an improvement of the water productivity of rainfed situation holds, particularly in the semi-arid tropical (SAT) region, a promise to increase the crop productivity due to a large gap between farmers’ yield and achievable yield. This gap can be filled considerably by adopting a sustainable management approach of natural resources, and in order to achieve this goal, an assessment of land/water and climate resources to create an integrated system needs to be given the highest priority. To make it happen, the task is to create near-homogeneous soil climatic regions that are compatible for sustenance of a particular group of crops and cultivars. A near-homogenous area having similar soil, bioclimate and moisture availability related to crop production is known as agro-ecological regions (AER). The AER made following the creation of broad crop feasibility zone based on length of moisture availability period, which was superimposed on FAO/UNESCO global soil and terrain map of 1:5000, 000 scales by Indian researchers as ecosystem service providers, is very broad and thus fraught with difficulty for crop planning both at state and district levels. Thereafter, several attempts were made in the recent past including the refinement of agro-ecological regions by the ICAR-NBSS &LUP to divide 20 agro-ecological regions (AER) into 60 agro-ecological subregions (AESRs) in 1999. The usefulness of 60 AESRs as ecosystem services was realized while estimating the stocks of soil carbon and available potassium of the Indo-Gangetic Plains (IGP) and black soil regions (BSR) and in prioritizing areas of carbon sequestration. But further research is warranted to refine the AESR boundaries in SAT climate, which can match rainfall with crop water requirement. Therefore, collection of antecedent soil moisture, after the cessation of rains when rainfall (P) falls short of 0.5 potential evapotranspiration (PE), becomes an essential requirement. In absence of such essential data, the present AESR boundaries vis-à-vis crop performance exhibit scenarios a little away from reality in SAT areas. The soil moisture dynamics is greatly influenced by saturated hydraulic conductivity (sHC), which in turn is affected by exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP). Besides, gypsum, Ca-rich zeolites and palygorskite also influence soil moisture. In the FAO method, the length of growing period (LGP) is computed from monthly/decadal precipitation (P) and potential evapotranspiration (PET). Available water holding capacity (AWC) of shrink-swell soils was computed considering the available water of all the soil layers to a depth of 1 m or up to least permeable layer (sHC < 10 mm h−1). Some of the measured sHC of the pedons indicated that the values vary from 4 to 20 mm h−1 and rapidly decrease with depth, even though the clay content with soil depth is almost uniform. This suggests that there is a need for correcting LGP and in turn AESRs, based on quantitative values of soil drainage, i.e. sHC data of soils. In view of immediate concern about the use of soil map information for agricultural land use planning, ICAR assisted and World Bank funded a National Agricultural Innovation Project (NAIP) ‘Geo referenced Soil Information System (GeoSIS) for Land Use Planning and Monitoring Soil and Land Quality for Agriculture’. This was executed during 2009–2014 by ICAR-NBSS&LUP as the Consortium Leader. One of the three primary objectives of this NAIP was ‘To prepare modified AESR map for agricultural land use planning’. It was envisaged that the project output will equip natural resource managers of the country with a soil information system, which will provide a robust platform for future monitoring of the changes in soil properties induced by dynamic land use changes. In this NAIP, the IGP and BSR were undertaken as these two are the major food production zones of the country. The spatio-temporal information on sHC and soil water retention-release behaviour are essential for crop and land use planning in SAT areas. For the IGP soils, the sHC is affected by the increased subsoil bulk density due to intensive cultivation. In the BSR, the presence of Na+ and Mg++ ions affects the drainage and water retention and release behaviour of the soils. The AESR maps of the IGP and BSR are modified based on newly acquired soil resource database and revised LGP class with greater emphasis on soil quality parameters linked with crop performance. Following this unique method, 17 AESRs of IGP and 27 AESRs of BSR are re-delineated, respectively, into 29 and 45 subregions. The observed compatibility between revised LGP and cotton yields in shrink-swell soils aptly justifies the inclusion of the proposal to modify the AESR boundaries as one of the objectives of GeoSIS under NAIP. Thus, in view of their ecosystem capacity to provide multiple biophysical and crop yield benefits, the modified AESRs should be considered as an effective ecosystem service provider of SAT soils. The soil property-driven revised AESR delineations thus add a unique value to the soil ecosystem services and can also act as a technology transfer tool for agricultural land use planning at the national and regional level.