Lactobacillus reuteri Enhances the Mucosal Barrier Function against Heat-killed Salmonella Typhimurium in the Intestine of Broiler Chicks

Takahiro Nii,Haruna Kakuya,Naoki Isobe,Yukinori Yoshimura
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.0190044
2020-01-01
The Journal of Poultry Science
Abstract:<i>Salmonella</i> Typhimurium (ST) infection in chickens inhibits their growth and can lead to food-borne diseases in humans. Probiotics are expected to enhance the function of host intestinal barrier against pathogen infection. The aim of our study was to determine the effect of viable <i>Lactobacillus reuteri</i> (LR) on the response of the mucosal barrier function to antigen stimulation in broiler chicks. Day-old male (<i>n</i>=8) and female (<i>n</i>=4) broiler chicks were orally administered either 1 × 10<sup>8</sup> LR or a water-only control, every day for 7 days. After 7 days, either 1 × 10<sup>8</sup> heat-killed ST (k-ST), or a buffer-only control, was administered via intra-cardiac injection. The ileum and cecum were collected 3 h post-injection, and paraffin sections were prepared for either mRNA extraction (males), or gut permeability tests (females). Villus and crypt lengths were determined via histological analysis. Real-time PCR was used to calculate expression levels of Toll-like receptors (TLRs), pro-inflammatory cytokines, anti-inflammatory cytokines, avian <i>β</i>-defensins, and tight-junction-associated molecules. Gut permeability was assessed using the inverted intestine method. We found that (1) expression of <i>TLR2-1, TLR21, TGF-β2</i> and <i>TGF-β3</i> were reduced following k-ST stimulation, but were unaffected by LR-treatment; (2) oral administration of LR led to increased <i>Claudin1, Claudin5, ZO2</i>, and <i>JAM2</i> expression following k-ST stimulation; (3) cecal permeability was reduced by co-treatment with LR and k-ST, but not by treatment with LR or k-ST alone. These results suggest that LR, as used in this study, may enhance the intestinal mucosal physical barrier function, but not the expression of other immune-related factors in newly hatched chicks.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?