Practices of traditionalization in Central Asia

Judith Beyer,Peter Finke
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02634937.2019.1636766
2019-07-03
Central Asian Survey
Abstract:Over the last two centuries, 'tradition'<span class="ref-lnk fn-ref-lnk"><a href="#"><sup>1</sup></a><span class="ref-overlay scrollable-ref"><span class="ref-fn-p">1 For better readability, we will put the term 'tradition' in quotation marks only when referencing the opinion of others.</span><a class="frontnotes">View all notes</a></span></span> has been invoked in Central Asia by Russian and Soviet regimes, as well as by local Central Asian elites, largely in two ways: either as a deficiency to be overcome (often in juxtaposition to an aspirational 'modernity') or as a quality to be embraced (often in alignment with nationalism). The two are not mutually exclusive or even strictly separate, but the distinction serves well to outline general themes and dynamics in the work of tradition. It is likewise difficult to make clear distinctions between academic analyses and everyday invocations of the term, as they play off one another, and entirely new genres of writing and practice are still emerging. The centrality of tradition in today's Central Asia cannot, however, be denied.
area studies
What problem does this paper attempt to address?