Prevalence, Antimicrobial Resistance, and Relatedness of Salmonella Isolated from Chicken, Pork and the Environment at Abattoirs and Supermarkets in Chongqing, China

Tingting Chen,Jiali Jiang,Chao Ye,Jianhua Xie,Xia Chen,Dongyi Xu,Zheng Zeng,Yuanyi Peng,Dong-Liang Hu,Rendong Fang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.13800/v1
2019-08-31
Abstract:Abstract Background: Salmonella is one of the most important foodborne pathogens, causing outbreaks of human salmonellosis worldwide. Owing to large scales of consumption markets, pork and poultry that contaminated by Salmonella could pose a tremendous threat to public health. The aim of this study was to investigate the contamination of Salmonella from chicken, pork and the environment in slaughtering and retailing segments in Chongqing, China. Results: A total of 115 Salmonella isolates were recovered from 1122 samples, with 10.76% (47/437) in slaughterhouses and 10.07% (68/675) in supermarkets. 30 different serotypes were identified, in which S. Derby, S. London and S. Rissen were mostly detected. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing and resistance genes verification were carried out to investigate the relationship between phenotypes and genotypes. Altogether, 75.65% isolates showed resistance to tetracycline, followed by 60.87% to doxycycline and 69.5% to ampicillin. More than half (50.43%) of the isolates were multidrug resistant, which were mostly from supermarkets (P<0.05). According to antibiotic resistance genes detection results, a high correlation between antibiotic phenotypes and genotypes was presented by lactam-, tetracycline-, and sulfonamide-resistant isolates. Multilocus sequence typing results showed 24 out of 115 isolates were ST40, which was the most prevalent. Furthermore, isolates from supermarkets (n=15) had more sequence types than that in slaughterhouses (n=3). Conclusion: Our study highlighted the fact that Salmonella contamination were more severe in pork production chain than that of chicken. Isolation rates were similar in slaughterhouses and supermarkets for both pork and chicken, but isolates from supermarkets had more MDR profiles and represented a wide range of serotypes and sequence types, indicating that more diverse sources of contamination in retailing.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?