Abstract:Design Smells are indicators of situations that negatively affect software quality attributes such as understandability, testability, extensibility, reusability, and maintainability in general. Improving maintainability is one of the cornerstones of making software evolution easier. Hence, Design Smell Detection is important in helping developers when making decisions that can improve software evolution processes. After a long period of research, it is important to organize the knowledge produced so far and to identify current challenges and future trends. In this paper, we analyze 18 years of research into Design Smell Detection. There is a wide variety of terms that have been used in the literature to describe concepts which are similar to what we have defined as “Design Smells,” such as design defect, design flaw, anomaly, pitfall, antipattern, and disharmony. The aim of this paper is to analyze all these terms and include them in the study. We have used the standard systematic literature review method based on a comprehensive set of 395 articles published in different proceedings, journals, and book chapters. We present the results in different dimensions of Design Smell Detection, such as the type or scope of smell, detection approaches, tools, applied techniques, validation evidence, type of artifact in which the smell is detected, resources used in evaluation, supported languages, and relation between detected smells and software quality attributes according to a quality model. The main contributions of this paper are, on the one hand, the application of domain modeling techniques to obtain a conceptual model that allows the organization of the knowledge on Design Smell Detection and a collaborative web application built on that knowledge and, on the other, finding how tendencies have moved across different kinds of smell detection, as well as different approaches and techniques. Key findings for future trends include the fact that all automatic detection tools described in the literature identify Design Smells as a binary decision (having the smell or not), which is an opportunity to evolve to fuzzy and prioritized decisions. We also find that there is a lack of human experts and benchmark validation processes, as well as demonstrating that Design Smell Detection positively influences quality attributes.

Design principles, architectural smells and refactorings for microservices: a multivocal review

Smells and Refactorings for Microservices Security: A Multivocal Literature Review

An empirical investigation on the relationship between design and architecture smells

Code smells and refactoring: A tertiary systematic review of challenges and observations

An Empirical Study on the Evolution of Design Smells

Tools for Refactoring to Microservices: A Preliminary Usability Report

From Monolith to Microservices: A Classification of Refactoring Approaches

Impacts, causes, and solutions of architectural smells in microservices: An industrial investigation

Semantic-based Architecture Smell Analysis

Software Design Smell Detection: a systematic mapping study

Architectural refactoring for the cloud: a decision-centric view on cloud migration

Code smells: A Synthetic Narrative Review

Microservices Anti Patterns: A Taxonomy

Revisiting the practices and pains of microservice architecture in reality: An industrial inquiry

Android Code Smells: From Introduction to Refactoring

Insights on Microservice Architecture Through the Eyes of Industry Practitioners

Microservices: How To Make Your Application Scale

Evaluation of Microservice Architectures: A Metric and Tool-Based Approach

Microservices: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow

Empirical Investigation of the Relationship Between Design Smells and Role Stereotypes

Facilitating Software Refactoring With Appropriate Resolution Order Of Bad Smells